Cormack v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 261 So. 2d 230 (La. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Cormack v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 261 So. 2d 230 (La. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Scoggins v. Smith (lactapp, 1977-02-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Scoggins v. Smith
La. Ct. App. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ocmond v. Eserman, 259 So.2d 600 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1972), writs refused 261 La. 825 , 261 So.2d 230 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Donald CORMACK
v.
The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
No. 52392.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 11, 1972.
261 So. 2d 230
Benefit, Dixon, Illusory, Interpreted, Issue, Provision, That.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published

[*826] We find no error of law in the Court of Appeal judgment.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the writ should issue. The policy provision as interpreted by the court of appeal gives a benefit for dental treatment that is largely illusory.