Tabb v. Norred, 279 So. 2d 694 (La. 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Tabb v. Norred, 279 So. 2d 694 (La. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Guidry v. Bank of LaPlace (lactapp, 1995-09-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Guidry v. Bank of LaPlace
La. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Tabb v. Norred, 277 So.2d 223 (La. 3rd Cir.), writ denied, 279 So.2d 694 (La.1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Abbott Laboratories
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., White v. Board of Trustees, 276 So.2d 714, 719 (La.Ct.App.) (deducting pro rata shares of an Article 595 attorney's fee from the awards due to each plaintiff), writ ref'd, 279 So.2d 694 (La.1973). 17 We disagree.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Free v. Abbott Laboratories
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., White v. Board of Trustees, 276 So.2d 714, 719 (La.Ct.App.) (deducting pro rata shares of an Article 595 attorney’s fee from the awards due to each plaintiff), writ ref'd, 279 So.2d 694 (La.1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Silver v. Nelson
E.D. La. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also Tabb v. Norred, 277 So.2d 223, 227 (La.App. 3d Cir.1973), writ refused, 279 So.2d 694 (La.1973). 15 Thus, to recover, a plaintiff must *517 prove that an agreement existed to commit an illegal or tortious act which resulted in the plaintiffs injury.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Otzenberger v. Atlas Construction Co.
La. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Tabb v. Norred, 277 So.2d 223 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1973), writ denied, 279 So.2d 694 (La.1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wilbert TABB
v.
James Christopher NORRED et al.
53644.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 29, 1973.
279 So. 2d 694
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Writ denied. Based on the specifications of error, we find no error of law under the facts found by the Court of Appeal.