IMC Expl. Co. v. Henderson, 423 So. 2d 1149 (La. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
IMC Expl. Co. v. Henderson, 423 So. 2d 1149 (La. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources (lactapp, 1994-04-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources
La. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Caldwell v. Texas Industries, Inc., 419 So.2d 86 (La.App. 2d Cir.1982) writ denied 423 So.2d 1149 (La. 1982); Gleason v. City of Shreveport, 393 So.2d 827 (La.App. 2d Cir.1981) writ denied 397 So.2d 806 (La.1981); Sevin v. Shape Spa for Health & Beauty, 384 So.2d 1011 (La.App. 4th Cir.1980).
discussed Cited "see" Crowell v. City of Alexandria ex rel. Snyder
La. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Caldwell v. Texas Industries, Inc., 419 So.2d 86 (La.App. 2d Cir.1982) writ denied 423 So.2d 1149 (La.1982); Gleason v. City of Shreveport, 393 So.2d 827 (La.App. 2d Cir.1981) writ denied 397 So.2d 806 (La.1981); Sevin v. Shape Spa for Health & Beauty, 384 So.2d 1011 (La.App. 4th Cir.1980).
discussed Cited "see" Fuller v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
La. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Caldwell v. Texas Industries, Inc., 419 So.2d 86 (La.App. 2d Cir.1982) writ denied 423 So.2d 1149 (La. 1982); Gleason v. City of Shreveport, 393 So.2d 827 (La.App. 2d Cir.1981) writ denied 397 So.2d 806 (La.1981); Sevin v. Shape Spa for Health & Beauty, 384 So.2d 1011 (La.App. 4th Cir.1980).
discussed Cited "see" Durr v. Blue
La. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See IMC Exploration Company and the Petroleum Corporation of Delaware v. Foster Henderson, 419 So.2d 490 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1982), writ denied, 423 So.2d 1149 , 1150 (La.1982), reconsideration denied, 427 So.2d 866 (La.1983), which outlines the sufficient basis to determine the paternity claim by a preponderance of the evidence. "` Preponderance of the evidence' clearly means `evidence which is of greater weight or more convincing than the evidence which is offered in opposition to it; that is, evidence which as a whole shows that the fact sought to be proved is more probable than not.' Braud v.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IMC EXPLORATION COMPANY and The Petroleum Corp. of Delaware
v.
Foster HENDERSON, et al.
82-C-2592.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Nov 29, 1982.
423 So. 2d 1149
Watson.
Published

Denied.

WATSON, J., would grant the writ.