Duke v. State, 456 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Duke v. State, 456 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Meshell (fla, 2009-01-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Meshell (2×)
Fla. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duke v. State, 444 So.2d 492 (Fla. 2nd DCA) (vaginal penetration followed a moment later by anal penetration), aff'd, 456 So.2d 893 (Fla.1984); Grunzel v. State, 484 So.2d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (cunnilingus followed a few seconds later by vaginal intercourse); Begley v. State, 483 So.2d 70 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (attempted vaginal intercourse, attempted cunnilingus, fellatio, committed over two week period); Bass v. State, 380 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (oral sex followed by rape).
discussed Cited "see" Saavedra v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duke v. State, 444 So.2d 492 (Fla. 2nd DCA) (vaginal penetration followed a moment later by anal penetration), aff'd, 456 So.2d 893 (Fla. 1984); Grunzel v. State, 484 So.2d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), (cunnilingus followed a few seconds later by vaginal intercourse); Begley v. State, 483 So.2d 70 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (attempted vaginal intercourse, attempted cunnilingus, fellatio, committed over two week period); Bass v. State, 380 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (oral sex followed by rape).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Drawdy v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Duke v. State, 444 So.2d 492, 493-94 (Fla. 2d DCA), ajfd, 456 So.2d 893 (Fla.1984) (vaginal penetration followed by anal penetration a moment later); Grunzel v. State, 484 So.2d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (cunnilingus followed by vaginal intercourse seconds later); Bass v. State, 380 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (oral sex followed by rape).
Carl DUKE
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 64876.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sep 27, 1984.
456 So. 2d 893
Carl Duke, in pro. per., Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, Ehrlich, McDonald, Overton, Shaw.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Approved. State v. Hogan, 451 So.2d 844 (Fla.1984); Rusaw v. State, 451 So.2d 469 (Fla.1984).

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.