Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. Isabella, 478 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 1985). · Go Syfert
Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. Isabella, 478 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Jones v. State (fladistctapp, 1987-03-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jones v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Gordon, 478 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 1985); Thomas v. State, 380 So.2d 1299 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 389 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 1980); Dorman v. State, 492 So.2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Vela v. State, 450 So.2d 305 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Barber v. State, 413 So.2d 482 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Goss v. State, 398 So.2d 998 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Muszynski v. State, 392 So.2d 63 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMPENSATION FUND
v.
Elvera ISABELLA and Albert Isabella
No. 66502.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 24, 1985.
478 So. 2d 1063
Betsy E. Gallagher of Talburt, Kubicki, Bradley and Draper, Miami, for petitioner., Sara Soto of Bailey and Dawes, Miami, for respondents.
Adkins, Boyd, Ehrlich, McDonald, Only, Overton, Shaw.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We have before us by petition for review Isabella v. Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund, 462 So.2d 129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), because of express and direct conflict with several district court of appeal decisions, including Taddiken v. Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund, 449 So.2d 956 (Fla.3d DCA 1984), and Fatal v. Florida Keys Memorial Hospital, 452 So.2d 946 (Fla.3d DCA 1984). The issue is whether the two-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983), is applicable to the Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund. In Taddiken v. Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund, 478 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1985), released today, we held that the statute is applicable. Respondents in the present case did not amend their complaint to join the Fund until more than four and a half years after accrual of their claim for medical malpractice. On the authority of Taddiken we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD and SHAW, JJ., concur. EHRLICH, J., concurs in result only. ADKINS, J., dissents.