State v. Vampran, 496 So. 2d 347 (La. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Vampran, 496 So. 2d 347 (La. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Daniels (lactapp, 2013-10-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Daniels
La. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Vampran, 491 So.2d 1356, 1367 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986), writ denied, 496 So.2d 347 (La.1986).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Scie
La. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Shannon, 360 So.2d 193 (La.1978)(where a defendant timely filed in the trial court a motion for a new trial based upon allegations of new and material evidence after the trial judge had ordered an appeal, case would be remanded to trial court |Mfor hearing on defendant’s motion) and State v. Vampran, 491 So.2d 1356 (La.App. 1 Cir.1986), writ denied, 496 So.2d 347 (La.1986)(whereupon entry of first order of appeal of defendant’s second-degree murder conviction, trial court was divested of jurisdiction to hear subsequent motion for new trial alleging discovery of new and materia…
cited Cited "see" State v. Scoby
La. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Vampran, 491 So.2d 1356, 1364 , (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 496 So.2d 347 (La. 1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Venson Dean VAMPRAN.
86-K-1763.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Nov 7, 1986.
496 So. 2d 347
Published

Writ denied. Consideration of defendant's claimed discovery violations regarding state witness James Tamplin is deferred until the district court and the Court of Appeal have ruled on the merits of defendant's motion for a new trial alleging the suppression of exculpatory evidence.