green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Riley v. Reliance Ins. Co.
See Waller v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 563 So.2d 1346 (La.App.4 Cir.), writ denied 568 So.2d 1059 (La.1990) and Robertson v. Popeye's Famous Fried Chicken, Inc., 524 So.2d 97 (La.App. 4 Cir.), writ denied 526 So.2d 802 (La.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
SUCCESSION OF THEROIT v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co.
See Robertson v. Popeye's Famous Fried Chicken, 524 So.2d 97 (La.App. 4th Cir.1988), writ denied 526 So.2d 802 (1988); Chatelain v. Project Square 221, 505 So.2d 177 (La.App. 4th Cir.1987), writ denied 508 So.2d 71 (1987); and Scott v. Barclay's American Leasing Service, 506 So.2d 823 (La.App. 1st Cir.1987), writ denied 508 So.2d 88 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Janice Frazier, Cross-Appellant v. John T. King, Etc., Charles Davoli, Linda Mills and Donald Guillory, Cross-Appellees. Janice Frazier, Paul Henry Kidd v. John T. King, Etc., Charles Davoli, Linda Mills, and Donald Guillory
See Robertson v. Popeye's Famous Fried Chicken, 524 So.2d 97 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 526 So.2d 802 (1988) (holding that plaintiff's demand for workers' compensation disability benefits differed from thing demanded in subsequent tort action). 29 B.
discussed
Cited "see"
Frazier v. King
See Robertson v. Popeye’s Famous Fried Chicken, 524 So.2d 97 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 526 So.2d 802 (1988) (holding that plaintiff’s demand for workers’ compensation disability benefits differed from thing demanded in subsequent tort action).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard ROBERTSON
v.
POPEYE'S FAMOUS FRIED CHICKEN INC., et al.
v.
POPEYE'S FAMOUS FRIED CHICKEN INC., et al.
88-C-1170.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 2, 1988.
Published
Denied.