green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Pratt v. Culpepper
See and compare Hunt v. Long, 33,395 (La.App.2d Cir.6/21/00), 763 So.2d 811 (trial court instructed jury that force-of-impact was not relevant in determining damages and there was no objection to the instruction). | In Fussell v. Roadrunner Towing & Recovery, Inc., 1999-0194 (La.App. 1st Cir.3/31/00), 765 So.2d 373 , writ denied, 2000-1264 (La.6/23/00), 765 So.2d 1042 , the first circuit observed that, if the medical and lay testimony is sufficient to prove that the collision caused some injuries, the minimal force of the impact that caused the injuries would seem irrelevant.
cited
Cited "see"
MSOF CORP. v. Exxon Corp.
See Fussell v. Roadrunner Towing and Recovery, Inc., 99-0194 (La.App. 1st Cir.3/31/00), 765 So.2d 373, 377 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/23/00), 765 So.2d 1042 .
cited
Cited "see"
Adeola v. Kemmerly
See Fussell v. Roadrunner Towing and Recovery, Inc., 99-0194, p. 6 (La.App. 1st Cir.3/31/00), 765 So.2d 373, 377-78 , writ denied, 2000-1264 (La.6/23/00), 765 So.2d 1042 .
cited
Cited "see"
Holliday v. Holliday
See Fussell v. Roadrunner Towing & Recovery, Inc., 99-0194 (La.App. 1st Cir.3/31/00), 765 So.2d 373, 377 , writ denied, 00-1264 (La.6/23/00), 765 So.2d 1042 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John Robinson, Jr. v. Pelican Waste & Debris, LLC, Prime Insurance Company and Jamie Delasbour
See also Fussell v. Roadrunner Towing and Recovery, Inc., 99- 0194 ( La.App. 1 Cir. 3/ 31/ 00), 765 So. 2d 373, 376 , writ denied, 2000- 1264 ( La. 6/ 23/ 00), 765 So. 2d 1042 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Louisiana
v.
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
v.
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
No. 2000-CC-1259.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 23, 2000.
Calogero, Marcus.
Published
Lead Opinion
In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 404,079; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 99 CW 2755
Denied.
Concurrence
CALOGERO, C.J.,
concurs in the court’s denial of the writ application. The case was dismissed without prejudice and because prescription does not run against the State, applicant is not precluded from filing anew its petitory action.
MARCUS, J., not on panel.