discussed Cited "see" Kutzorik v. State See generally Perko v. State, 874 So.2d 666, 667 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (Klein, J., concurring) (noting that it would never occur to any person unversed in search and seizure law that he or she could withdraw her consent at any time), review granted, Table No. SC04-1324, 888 So.2d 17 , 2004 WL 2889908 (Fla. Nov. 5, 2004).

discussed Cited "see" State v. Baez See Golphin v. State, 838 So.2d 705, 706 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (declaring conflict with Baez ), review granted, No. SC03-554, 888 So.2d 17 (Fla. Nov. 5, 2004); Perko v. State, 874 So.2d 666, 667 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (noting conflict with Golphin ), review granted, No. SC04-1324, 888 So.2d 18 (Fla. Nov.5, 2004). [6] At oral argument, the Assistant Attorney General informed us that "the State has said from the onset and continues to say that this is purely a consensual encounter." In the reply brief filed in this Court, the State represented that it "agrees that in this case there was no ground for…