discussed Cited "see" State of Florida v. Korson See Givens v. State, 851 So. 2d 813, 814-15 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review denied, 917 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 2005); cf. Hurtado v. State, 332 So. 3d 15 , 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021) ("Finally, we are not troubled by the application of the current version of the ["Romeo and Juliet"] statute [section 943.04354] to Hurtado.

cited Cited "see" Cabrera v. State See Hanson v. State, 905 So.2d 1036 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 917 So.2d 193 (Fla.2005).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Galindez v. State See, e.g., Hicks v. State, 905 So.2d 990 , 991 (Fla. 3d DCA) (holding that because Apprendi does not apply retroactively, neither does Blakely ), review denied, 917 So.2d 193 (Fla.2005); Burrows v. State, 890 So.2d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (same), review denied, 914 So.2d 952 (Fla.2005); McBride v. State, 884 So.2d 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (same).