green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Gibbs v. Buck
Co., 241 F. 353, 356 , referred to with apparent approval in Lion Bonding Co. v. Karatz, supra . [22] Smith v. Swormstedt, 16 How. 288 . [23] Beatty v. Kurtz, 2 Pet. 566 . [24] Eberhard case, supra, 356. [25] Shields v. Thomas, 17 How. 3 , but see Chapman v. Handley, 151 U.S. 443 . [26] Troy Bank v. Whitehead & Co., 222 U.S. 39, 41 . [27] Id. 40 . [28] Alaska Packers Assn. v. Pillsbury, 301 U.S. 174, 177 ; Christopher v. Brusselback, 302 U.S. 500, 505 ; see, KVOS, Inc. v. Associated Press, 299 U.S. 269, 279 . [29] Pope v. Blanton, 10 F. Supp. 15, 18 , dismissed per curiam for lack of requisite…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lauro
v.
Barker
v.
Barker
No. 374.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1937.
Mr. Henry N. Rapaport, with whom Messrs. Irving S. Rapaport and Robert S. Garson were on the brief, for appellants., Messrs. Lawrence S. Greenbaum, Benjamin J. Rabin, Theodore S. Jaffin, Benjamin Kaplan, and Maurice Finkelstein were on the brief for appellees.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellees to affirm the judgment is granted, and the judgment is affirmed. (1) Bellingham Bay Co. [*522] v. New Whatcom, 172 U. S. 314, 318, 319; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 81; Wick v. Chelan Electric Co., 280 U. S. 108, 110, 111. (2) Gilfillan v. Union Canal Co., 109 U. S. 401.
Mr. Henry N. Rapaport, with whom Messrs. Irving S. Rapaport and Robert S. Garson were on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Lawrence S. Greenbaum, Benjamin J. Rabin, Theodore S. Jaffin, Benjamin Kaplan, and Maurice Finkelstein were on the brief for appellees.