green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. Luther Miller v. John J. Twomey, Warden, and Peter B. Bensinger, Director, Etc., Andrew Green v. Peter Bensinger, Jack R. Thomas v. Peter B. Bensinger, Etc., Herman Krause and Willie Moore, Etc. v. Wilbur J. Schmidt, Etc., Alfred Armstrong, and Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v. Peter B. Bensinger, Simon S. Gutierrez v. Department of Public Safety
See Gunsolus v. Gagnon, 454 F.2d 416 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. granted sub nom., Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 408 U.S. 921 , 92 S.Ct. 2490 , 33 L.Ed.2d 331 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Miller v. Twomey
See Gunsolus v. Gagnon, 454 F.2d 416 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. granted sub nom., Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 408 U.S. 921 , 92 S.Ct. 2490 , 33 L.Ed.2d 331 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. Rundle
See Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 408 U.S. 921 (right to counsel on revocation of probation where sentence has been imposed previously).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald Edward Mozingo v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, Folsom State Prison
See Scarpelli v. Gagnon, 317 F.Supp. 72 (E.D.Wis.1970), aff’d, Gunsolus v. Gagnon, 454 F.2d 416, 418, 423 (7th Cir. 1971) , cert. granted, 408 U.S. 921 , 92 S.Ct. 2490 , 33 L.Ed.2d 331 (1972). 1 Having in view the previous state court proceedings in which Mozingo sought to set aside the parole revocation in issue, we also reject appellant’s contention that Mozingo has failed to exhaust his state remedies.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Batson v. Kentucky
(2×)
See, e. g., Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 408 U. S. 921 (1972); Colorado v. Connelly, 474 U. S. 1050 (1986). [1] Even following oral argument, we could have as we sometimes do directed reargument on this particular question.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gagnon, Warden
v.
Scarpelli
v.
Scarpelli
No. 71-1225.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 1972.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that William M. Coffey, Esquire, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.