Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Baltimore, 156 U.S. 210 (1895). · Go Syfert
Search
Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Baltimore, 156 U.S. 210 (1895). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bellsouth Telecomm., Inc. v. City of Memphis, No. CH-01-1351-3 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 12, 2004)
Treatment trajectory · 1903 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1903 1964 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 356 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Bellsouth Telecomm., Inc. v. City of Memphis, No. CH-01-1351-3 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 12, 2004).published
    Indeed that case, if we are right in thinking that the Tennessee Act of 1885 did not deprive the city of the control of its streets in this regard, is ample authority for holding that it had power to levy and collect the charges in questio…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
POSTAL TELEGRAPH CABLE COMPANY
v.
BALTIMORE.
828.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 28, 1895.
Published opinion
156 U.S. 210
1895 U.S. LEXIS 2127
The Chief Justice:.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND.

[*211] Mr. Thomas G. Hayes and Mr. William S. Bryan, Jr., for the motion.

Mr. George H. Bates opposing.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE: The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of St. Louis v. Western Union Tel. Co., 148 U.S. 92.