S. Pac. Co. v. California Adjustment Co., 248 U.S. 595 (1919). · Go Syfert
Search
S. Pac. Co. v. California Adjustment Co., 248 U.S. 595 (1919). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corp. (scotus, 2010-06-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1922 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1922 1974 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corp.
SCOTUS · 2010 · confidence medium
Given that the first rail carrier was in each case the carrier that received the goods from the shipper and issued a through bill of lading, it is unsurprising that the Court, applying Carmack, described that carrier as the “initial carrier.” 248 U. S., at 595; 331 U. S., at 733 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, Limited
9th Cir. · 1950 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bluefields S. S. Co. v. United Fruit Co., 3 Cir., 243 F. 1, 20 , appeal dismissed 248 U.S. 595 , 39 S.Ct. 136 , 63 L.Ed. 438 , “The statute began to run when the cause of action arose, and the cause of action arose when the damage occurred.” Cases relied upon by appellants in support of the theory that the statute does not start to run until the last overt act are criminal cases where the gravamen of the offense is the conspiracy. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 ; United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150 , 60 S.Ct. 811 , 84 L.Ed. 1129 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Southern Pacific Company
v.
California Adjustment Company
No. 150.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1919.
248 U.S. 595
Mr. C. W. Durbrow and Mr. W. F. Herrin for petitioner. Mr. Leon E. Morris for respondent.
Published

Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for petitioner.