discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Shoshone River Power, Inc. generally, the buyer in a requirements contract does not impliedly promise that he will have needs in order to fulfill his requirements contract.

discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Tri-State Generation And Transmission Association, Inc. v. Shoshone River Power, Inc. generally, the buyer in a requirements contract does not impliedly promise that he will have needs in order to fulfill his requirements contract.

discussed Cited "see" NCC Sunday Inserts, Inc. v. World Color Press, Inc. See In re United Cigar Stores of Am., 72 F.2d 673, 675 (2d Cir.) (dicta) (citing Chalmers & Williams v. Walter Bledsoe & Co., 218 Ill.App. 363 (1920), as authority for impliedly obligating a requirements buyer to have requirements throughout the term of the contract), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 617 , 55 S.Ct. 210 , 79 L.Ed. 706 (1934)).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mailet (2×) Accord, Void, Law of Sales § 36, p. 215 (2d ed. 1959); see Jonesboro Compress Co. v. Mente & Co., Inc., 1934, 8 Cir., 72 F.2d 3 , certiorari denied, 1934, 293 U.S. 618 , 55 S.Ct. 210 , 79 L.Ed. 707 .

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Founders General Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (2×) See, also, General Gas & Electric Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 293 U. S. 618 , 55 S. Ct. 210 , 79 L.