green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.
See Jarvill, 289 Or at 180 (attributing source of “genuine differences” to Huckaba); Huckaba, 281 Or at 25-26 (discussing principle of federal equal protection law); see also Metropolitan Co. v. Brownell, 294 US 580, 583 , 55 S Ct 538 , 79 L Ed 1070 , reh’g den, 295 US 767 , 55 S Ct 647 , 79 L Ed 1708 (1935) (question is not whether classes are different, “but whether the differences between them are pertinent to the subject with respect to which the classification is made”; if “those differences have any rational relationship to the leg- islative command, the discrimination is not…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.
See Jarvill, 289 Or at 180 (attributing source of “genuine differences” to Huckaba); Huckaba, 281 Or at 25-26 (discussing principle of federal equal protection law); see also Metropolitan Co. v. Brownell, 294 US 580, 583 , 55 S Ct 538 , 79 L Ed 1070 , reh’g den, 295 US 767 , 55 S Ct 647 , 79 L Ed 1708 (1935) (question is not whether classes are dif- ferent, “but whether the differences between them are perti- nent to the subject with respect to which the classification is made”; if “those differences have any rational relationship to the legislative command, the discrimination is n…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Swinson
v.
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.
v.
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.
No. 383.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 8, 1935.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for rehearing denied.