green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1938 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1938
1982
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Labor Relations Board v. Gotham Shoe Manufacturing Co., Inc.
(2×)
the union was prepared to prove its majority status'; 'it is clear that the union was at all times here relevant ready and willing to demonstrate its majority status to petitioner
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board, and Local 107, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenor v. Solboro Knitting Mills, Inc.
See NLRB v. Remington Rand, Inc., 94 F.2d 862, 872 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 304 U.S. 576 , 58 S.Ct. 1046 , 82 L.Ed. 1540 (1938).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 30191 Summary Calendar.
See N.L.R.B. v. Remington Rand, Inc., 2 Cir. 1939, 94 F.2d 862, 872 , cert. denied, 304 U.S. 576 , 58 S.Ct. 1046 , 82 L.Ed. 1540 ; cf. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 5 Cir. 1966, 360 F.2d 569 , 572-573 6 In a prior decision the Board concluded that the strike of May 1, 1968, was an economic strike rather than an unfair labor practice strike.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Kingston Cake Co., Inc.
(2×)
See also National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc., 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 872 , certiorari denied, 1938, 304 U.S. 576 , 585, 58 S.Ct. 1046 , 82 L.Ed. 1540 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Fried
(2×)
See also Eastus v. Bradshaw, 5 Cir., 94 F.2d 788 , certiorari denied 304 U.S. 576 , 58 S.Ct. 1045 , 82 L.Ed. 1539 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Valley Mould & Iron Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
International Association of Machinists v. National Labor Relations Board, 71 App.D.C. 175 , 110 F.2d 29 ; see also National Labor Relations Board v. Remington-Rand Inc., 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 870 , certiorari denied 304 U.S. 576 , 58 S.Ct. 1046 , 82 L.Ed. 1540 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Remington Rand, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board.
v.
National Labor Relations Board.
970.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1938.
304 U.S. 576
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)
REMINGTON RAND, Inc., petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.[*]
No. 970.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 23, 1938
Messrs. George H. Bond, of Syracuse, N. Y., and George H. Cohen, of Hartford, Conn., for petitioner.
1
For opinion below, see 94 F.2d 862.
2
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
*
Rehearing denied 304 .S. 590 , 58 S.Ct. 1054, 82 L.Ed. ——.