Columbia Terminals Co. v. Lambert, 309 U.S. 620 (1940). · Go Syfert
Search
Columbia Terminals Co. v. Lambert, 309 U.S. 620 (1940). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Napierkowski v. Township of Gloucester (nj, 1959-04-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1941 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1941 1983 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Napierkowski v. Township of Gloucester
N.J. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See *493 e. g., Cady v. City of Detroit, 289 Mich. 499 , 286 N. W. 805 (Sup. Ct. 1939), appeal dismissed 309 U. S. 620 , 60 S. Ct. 470 , 84 L.
discussed Cited "see" Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. Wood (2×)
SCOTUS · 1953 · signal: see · confidence high
See Columbia Terminals Co. v. Lambert, 30 F. Supp. 28, 32 , and 309 U. S. 620 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Columbia Terminals Co.
v.
Lambert
No. 629.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 29, 1940.
309 U.S. 620
Messrs. Guy A. Thompson and Charles M. Spence for appellant., Messrs. James H. Linton, Daniel C. Rogers, and Edgar H. Wayman for appel-lees.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam,:

The decree is vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint on the merits. Eichholz v. Public Service Commission, 306 U. S. 268; Welch Co. v. New Hampshire, 306 U. S. 79.