green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1942 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1942
1984
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Department of Fair Employment v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.
See Moor v. Alameda Cnty., 311 U.S. 693 , 717 (1973). 5382 DFEH v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES A The answer to this question is established by long-standing precedent.
cited
Cited "see"
Haber v. United States
See Southeast Bank, 230 Ct.Cl. at 284 , 676 F.2d at 664 (citing Einsom-Freeman Co. v. Corwin, 112 F.2d 683 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 693 , 61 S.Ct. 75 , 85 L.Ed. 44 (1940)).
cited
Cited "see"
Jolivet v. Elkins
See Einson-Freeman Co. v. Corwin, 112 F.2d 683, 684 (2d Cir. 1940), cert. den., 311 U.S. 693 , 61 S.Ct. 75, 85 L.Ed. 449 (1940).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
School Board of Norfolk
v.
Alston
v.
Alston
No. 429.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 28, 1940.
Mr. R. M. Hughes, Jr. for petitioners. Messrs. Leon A. Ransom, Thurgood Marshall, Benjamin Kaplan, and W. Robert Ming, Jr. for respondents. '
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.