green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.2 score
“a scheme to get money unfairly by ... corrupting one who acts for another or advises him, would be a scheme to defraud_”
Treatment trajectory · 1941 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1941
1983
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
GLM CORP. v. Klein
a scheme to get money unfairly by ... corrupting one who acts for another or advises him, would be a scheme to defraud_
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Lee Prueitt, United States of America v. Karl Darrell Petersen, United States of America v. Neil Lee Temple, United States of America v. Phillipp Michael Bourchier, United States of America v. Dwayne David Walker, United States of America v. Darla Loree Blickenstaff, A/K/A Darla Loree Jenkins
See Shushan v. United States, 117 F.2d 110, 114 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 , reh. denied, 314 U.S. 706 , 62 S.Ct. 53 , 86 L.Ed. 564 (1941); United States v. Powell, 81 F.Supp. 288, 291 (E.D.Mo.1948).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Prueitt
See Shushan v. United States, 117 F.2d 110, 114 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 , reh. denied, 314 U.S. 706 , 62 S.Ct. 53 , 86 L.Ed. 564 (1941); United States v. Powell, 81 F.Supp. 288, 291 (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Robert Wrigley
See Shushan v. United States, 117 *365 F.2d 110 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 (1941) (indictment of persons not named in letter of appointment); United States v. Amazon Industrial Chemical Corp., 55 F.2d 254 (D.Md.1931) (same); United States v. Huston, supra (not authorized by letter of appointment to proceed in district); United States v. Morse, 292 F. 273 (S.D.N.Y.1922) (indictment of persons not named in letter of appointment). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ted Bristol
See Shushan v. United States, 5 Cir. 1941, 117 F.2d 110 , cert. denied, 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Paroutian v. United States
See, Shushan v. United States, 117 F.2d 110 , 133 A.L.R. 1040 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 (1941); Latham v. United States, 226 F. 420 , L.R.A.19160, 1118 (5th Cir. 1915); United States v. Borys, 169 F. Supp. 366 (D.Alaska 1959); United States v. Carper, 116 F.Supp. 817 (D.D.C.1953); United States v. Smyth, 104 F.Supp. 283 (N.D.Cal.1952); United States v. Powell, 81 F.Supp. 288 (E.D.Mo.1948); United States v. Weathers, 21 F.Supp. 763 (N.D.Ga.1937); United States v. Goldman, 28 F.2d 424 (D.Conn. 1928); United States v. Huston, 28 F.2d 451 (N.D.Ohio 1928…
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. United States
See, Shushan v. United States, 5 Cir., 117 F.2d 110 , 133 A.L.R. 1040 , certiorari denied 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 ; Belt v. United States, 5 Cir., 73 F.2d 888 ; United States v. Powell, D.C., 81 F.Supp. 288 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. United States
See, Shushan v. United States, 5 Cir., 117 F. 2d 110 , 133 A.L.R. 1040 , certiorari denied 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 ; Belt v. United States, 5 Cir., 73 F. 2d 888 ; United States v. Powell, D.C., 81 F.Supp. 288 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lopez-Lukis
See, e.g., Shushan v. United States, 117 F.2d 110 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 (1941).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fineman
See also Shushan v. U. S., 117 F.2d 110, 115 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 (1941); U. S. v. Dixon, 536 F.2d 1388 (2d Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Holmes
See also Shushan v. United States, 5 Cir., 1941, 117 F.2d 110, 113 , cert. denied 1941, 313 U.S. 574 , 61 S. Ct. 1085 , 85 L.Ed. 1531 , rehearing denied 1941, 314 U.S. 706 , 62 S.Ct. 53 , 86 L.Ed. 564 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
v.
Richardson
v.
Richardson
No. 930.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 5, 1941.
Mr. Ben B. Wickham for petitioner. Mr. M. C. Harrison for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.