Bailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 314 U.S. 616 (1941). · Go Syfert
Bailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 314 U.S. 616 (1941). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
54 citation events across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Peter MacDonald (ca9, 1994-01-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1942 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1942 1984 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Peter MacDonald
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Amrep Corp., 560 F.2d 539, 546 (2d Cir.1977) (citing Simons v. United States, 119 F.2d 539, 549 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 616 (1941)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1015 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" John Leary v. United States (2×)
9th Cir. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See Simons v. United States, 9 Cir., 119 F.2d 539 , certiorari denied 314 U.S. 616 , 62 S.Ct. 78 , 86 L.Ed. 496 ; Freeman v. United States, 2 Cir., 227 F. 732 , contra.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jerry R. Mastelotto, and Willis B. Inglesby
9th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Simons v. United States, 119 F.2d 539, 547-48 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 616 , 62 S.Ct. 78 , 86 L.Ed. 496 (1941); Weiss v. United States, 122 F.2d 675, 680-81 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 687 , 62 S.Ct. 300 , 86 L.Ed. 550 (1941); Worthington , 64 F.2d *1245 at 938-39; McLendon, 2 F.2d at 661 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Haggerty (2×)
La. · 1970 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Davis, Sec. 14.01; see, e. g., United States v. Mortimer, 118 F.2d 266 (CA 2, 1940), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 616 , 62 S.Ct. 58 , 86 L.Ed. 496 (1941), and Samuel H.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bailey
v.
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
No. 217.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1941.
314 U.S. 616
Mr. John F. Reilly for petitioner. Messrs. Stephen H. Philbin and Clyde A. Norton for respondent.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.