green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1942 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1942
1984
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ford Motor Co. v. United States
On November 17, 1939, the jury returned a general verdict of guilty against General Motors, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the judgment upon that verdict, 121 F. 2d 376 , and this Court denied further review. 314 U. S. 618 ; id. at 710.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,502 Howard H. Mason v. Bradley Unkeless
(2×)
Even if Mason's investment in the Lancelles' business were an investment contract within the definition of a federal security, 3 Unkeless could not be held liable on the basis of a conversation in which there was no suggestion whatever that Mason purchase a security. 10 This does not mean that a securities defendant must know that the conduct in which he is engaging is proscribed, Byrnes v. Faulkner, Dawkins & Sullivan, 413 F.Supp. 453, 470 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd, 550 F.2d 1303 (2d Cir. 1977); see SEC v. Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Association, Inc., 120 F.2d 738 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 31…
cited
Cited "see"
Joe Westbrook, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.
Accord, United States v. General Motors Corp., 121 F.2d 376, 404 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 618 , 62 S.Ct. 105 , 86 L.Ed. 497 (1941).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tv Signal Company of Aberdeen v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company and Northwestern Bell Telephone Company
See United States v. General Motors Corporation, 7 Cir., 121 F.2d 376, 404 , cert. denied 314 U.S. 618 , 62 S.Ct. 105 , 86 L.Ed. 497 (a vertical conspiracy), and Tamaron Distributing Corporation v. Weiner, 7 Cir., 418 F.2d 137 , 139 (conspiracy between manufacturer and noncompetitive agent).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. St. Louis Dairy Co.
See United States v. General Motors Corporation, 7 Cir., 121 F.2d 376 , certiorari denied 314 U.S. 618 , 62 S.Ct. 105 , 86 L.Ed. 497 , and American Medical Ass'n v. United States, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 70 , 130 F.2d 233 , affirmed 317 U.S. 519 , 63 S.Ct. 326 , 87 L.Ed. 434 .
discussed
Cited "see"
American Medical Ass'n v. United States
See United States v. Bergdoll, D.C.E.D.Pa., 272 F. 498, 505 , certiorari denied 259 U.S. 585 , 42 S.Ct. 589 , 66 L.Ed. 1076 . 97 United States v. Austin-Bagley Corp., 2 Cir., 31 F.2d 229, 233 , certiorari denied 279 U.S. 863 , 49 S.Ct. 479 , 73 L.Ed. 1002 . 98 United States v. General Motors Corp., 7 Cir., 121 F.2d 376, 411 , certiorari denied 314 U.S. 618 , 62 S.Ct. 105 , 86 L.Ed. -. 99 McCandless v. Furlaud, 296 U.S. 140, 165 , 56 S.Ct. 41 , 80 L.Ed. 121 ; United States v. Anderson, 7 Cir., 101 F.2d 325, 332, 333 , certiorari denied 307 U.S. 625 , 59 S.Ct. 822 , 83 L.Ed. 1502 ; Thornton, Com…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League
See also United States v. General Motors Corp., 121 F.2d 376 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 618 , 62 S.Ct. 105 , 86 L.Ed. 497 (1941), *584 affirming the conviction of four corporations for violating section 1 of the Sherman Act.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corporation
Compare the facts in Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States, supra, and United States v. General Motors Corporation, 7 Cir., 1941, 121 F. 2d 376 , certiorari denied 1941, 314 U.S. 618 , 62 S.Ct. 105 , 86 L.Ed. 497 , relied on by the Government.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Tobacco Co. v. United States
See also, United States v. General Motors Corp., 7 Cir., 121 F.2d 376 , certiorari denied 314 U.S. 618 , 62 S.Ct. 105 , 86 L.Ed. 497 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Detroit Edison Co.
v.
Securities & Exchange Commission
v.
Securities & Exchange Commission
No. 349.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1941.
Messrs. John Foster Dulles and Oscar C. Hull for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Arnold Raum, Chester T. Lane, Christopher M. Jenks, Lawrence S. Lesser, J. Leonard Townsend, and Homer Kripke for respondent.
Application, Consideration, Douglas, Took.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.