Hazeltine Corp. v. Crosley Corp., 315 U.S. 813 (1942). · Go Syfert
Search
Hazeltine Corp. v. Crosley Corp., 315 U.S. 813 (1942). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
104 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re: Sk Foods, L.P. (bap9, 2013-12-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1942 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1942 1984 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In re: Sk Foods, L.P.
9th Cir. BAP · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crosley 21 Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., 122 F.2d 925, 929 (3d Cir. 1941), 22 cert. denied, 315 U.S. 813 (1942) (rule applies when two actions 23 are pending in courts of equal dignity within the judicial 24 system of a single sovereignty); see also Leomporra v. Jet Linx 25 Aviation, Inc., 2009 WL 1514517 , at *2 n.2 (D.
discussed Cited "see" Moore Corp. Ltd. v. Wallace Computer Services, Inc.
D. Del. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crosley Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., 122 F.2d 925, 929 (3d Cir.1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 813 , 62 S.Ct. 798 , 86 L.Ed. 1211 (1942); see also E.E.O.C. v. University of Pa., 850 F.2d 969, 971 (3d Cir.), cert. granted in part, 488 U.S. 992 , 109 S.Ct. 554 , 102 L.Ed.2d 581 (1988), aff'd, 493 U.S. 182 , 110 S.Ct. 577 , 107 L.Ed.2d 571 (1990) [hereinafter EEOC ].
cited Cited "see" Harthman v. Texaco, Inc.
D.V.I. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine Corporation, 122 F.2d 9256 (3d Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 813 (1942).
discussed Cited "see" University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
SCOTUS · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crosley Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., 122 F. 2d 925, 929 (CA3 1941), cert. denied, 315 U. S. 813 (1942); Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinea v. Insurance Co. of North America, 651 F. 2d 877, 887, n. 10 (CA3 1981), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see" Harry E. Hoover v. The United States Department of the Interior
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Semmes Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 429 F.2d 1197, 1203 (2d Cir. 1970) ("(c)ourts already heavily burdened with litigation with which they must of necessity deal should . . . not be called upon to duplicate each other's work in cases involving the same issues and the same parties," Citing Crosley Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., 122 F.2d 925, 930 (3d Cir. 1941), Cert. denied, 315 U.S. 813 , 62 S.Ct. 798 , 86 L.Ed. 1211 (1942)). 9 In an FOIA suit involving Exemption 5, the needs of particular litigants are not relevant to the question of disclosure.
cited Cited "see" Middleton v. United States
D.C. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Boyer, supra. 34 See also United States v. Novick, 124 F.2d 107, 109 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 813 , 62 S.Ct. 795 , 86 L.Ed. 1212 (1942).
cited Cited "see" Ultronic Systems Corp. v. Ultronix, Inc.
D. Del. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crosley Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., 122 F.2d 925, 930 (3rd Cir., 1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 813 , 62 S.Ct. 798 , 86 L.Ed. 1211 (1941).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hazeltine Corporation
v.
Crosley Corporation
No. 892.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 1942.
315 U.S. 813
Messrs. William H. Davis' and R. M. Adams for petitioner. Messrs. Samuel E. Darby, Jr. and Floyd H. Crews for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.