Kramer v. Sheehy, 316 U.S. 646 (1942). · Go Syfert
Search
Kramer v. Sheehy, 316 U.S. 646 (1942). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Talamini, Administratrix of the Estate of Talamini v. Allstate Insurance Co. (scotus, 1985-03-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Talamini, Administratrix of the Estate of Talamini v. Allstate Insurance Co.
SCOTUS · 1985 · confidence medium
See, e. g., Tatum v. Regents of University of Nebraska, 462 U. S. 1117 (1983); Bohn v. Bohn, 316 U. S. 646, 647 (1942) (per curiam) (“it appearing that the appeal was frivolous and taken merely for delay”); Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191, 193 (1929); Slaker v. O’Connor, 278 U. S. 188, 190 (1929); Wagner Electric Mfg.
cited Cited "see" Farrell v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Banque de France v. Supreme Court, 287 N.Y. 483 , 41 N.E.2d 65 , cert. denied, 316 U.S. 646 , 62 S.Ct. 1279 , 86 L.Ed. 1730 (1942); Gano-Moore Coal Mining Co. v. W.
cited Cited "see" Farrell v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Banque de France v. Supreme Court, 287 N.Y. 483 , 41 N.E.2d 65 , cert. denied, 316 U.S. 646 , 62 S.Ct. 1279 , 86 L.Ed. 1730 (1942); Gano-Moore Coal Mining Co. v. W.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kramer
v.
Sheehy, Warden
No. 1202.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 25, 1942.
316 U.S. 646
John A. Kramer, pro se. Messrs. Gray Mashburn, Attorney General of Nevada, and John W. Bonner for appellee.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Nevada.

Per Curiam:

The Court has examined all the federal questions raised by appellant. It finds that the attack upon the validity of the state statute raises no substantial federal question (Wolfgang v. California, 270 U. S. 627, and cases cited), and that none of the other questions presented warrant further review. The motion to dismiss is therefore granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.