green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1946 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1946
1986
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Fijal v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
It is well established that assumption of risk is not available as a defense in Jones Act cases ( 46 USC § 688 ; 45 USC § 54 ; see, Roberts v United Fisheries Vessels Co., 141 F2d 288, 292-293, cert denied 323 US 753 ; 2 Norris, Seamen § 30:33 [4th ed]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gibson v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
The law is clear that assumption of the risk is not a defense in maritime cases ( 46 USC § 688 ; 45 USC § 54 ; see, Roberts v United Fisheries Vessels Co., 141 F2d 288, 292-293, cert denied 323 US 753 ; 2 Norris, Seamen § 30:33 [4th ed]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Parke, Austin & Lipscomb, Inc.
v.
Federal Trade Commission
v.
Federal Trade Commission
No. 392.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1944.
Mr. William A. Hines for petitioners., Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Charles H. Weston, W. T. Kelley, and Jos. J. Smith, Jr. for respondent.
Published
[*753] Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.