Fraser v. Barton, 324 U.S. 849 (1945). · Go Syfert
Search
Fraser v. Barton, 324 U.S. 849 (1945). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “Assuming the order of the court compelling disclosure to have been erroneous as an invasion of privacy in communications between husband and wife, the disclosure, once made, is irrevocable. It is public property and may not be recalled.”
37 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Clark (minn, 1980-07-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1945 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1945 1985 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Clark
Minn. · 1980 · signal: cf. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
assuming the order of the court compelling disclosure to have been erroneous as an invasion of privacy in communications between husband and wife, the disclosure, once made, is irrevocable. it is public property and may not be recalled.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fraser et ux.
v.
Barton
No. 805.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 26, 1945.
324 U.S. 849
Mr. Wils Davis for petitioners., Mr. L. E. Gwinn for Barton et al.;, Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, Messrs. Charles H. Weston, J. Stephen Doyle, Jr., W. Carroll Hunter and Mrs. Mary Connor Myers for the United States, respondents.
Cited by 16 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Minnesota (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.