discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jimmy D. Webster, Jr. See Davis v. United States, 328 U.S. 582 , reh'g denied, 329 U.S. 824 (1946); United States v. Gargotto, 510 F.2d 409, 411 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 987 , reh'g denied, 423 U.S. 884 (1975). 29 Moreover, we reject defendant's contention that there was no foundation for the admission of these checks.

cited Cited "see" DeRochemont v. COMMISSIONER-IRS See, Davis v. United States, 328 U.S. 582, 593-594 , 66 S.Ct. 1256, 1261-1262 , 90 L.Ed.2d 1453 (1946), reh’g denied, 329 U.S. 824 , 67 S.Ct. 107 , 91 L.Ed. 700 (1946).

discussed Cited "see" State v. Cobb See, Davis v. U.S., 328 U.S. 582 , 90 L.Ed. 1453 , 66 S.Ct. 1256 , reh. denied, 329 U.S. 824 , 91 L.Ed. 700 , 67 S.Ct. 107 (1946). *18 It is, however, a factor which must be considered, Hubbard v. Tinsley, 350 F. 2d 397 (10th Cir. 1965); State v. King, 44 N.J. 346 , 209 A. 2d 110 (1965), and places a greater burden upon the State to show voluntariness.

cited Cited "see, e.g." Maurice A. Hutcheson v. United States See also Zap v. United States, 330 U.S. 800 , 67 S.Ct. 857 , 91 L.Ed. 1259 (1946), 329 U.S. 824 , 67 S.Ct. 107 , 91 L.Ed. 700 (1946), 328 U.S. 624 , 66 S.Ct. 1277 , 90 L.Ed. 1477 (1946).