green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“a boundary cannot be drawn with precision”
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wanamaker v. Albrecht
if an issue is raised and the party who has the burden fails in his proof and the issue is decided against him, he is just as much bound by collateral estoppel as though he had presented a barrel of testimony.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Slimfold Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Kinkead Industries, Inc. And United States Gypsum Company, Defendants
a boundary cannot be drawn with precision
discussed
Cited "see"
Donegal Steel Foundry Co., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Accurate Products Co., a New Jersey Corporation
See United States v. Silliman, 167 F.2d 607, 613-14 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 825 , 69 S.Ct. 48 , 93 L.Ed. 379 (1948); Ettin v. Ava Truck Leasing, Inc., 53 N.J. 463 , 251 A.2d 278 (1969); Washington Tp. v. Gould, 39 N.J. 527 , 189 A.2d 697 , 700 (1963). 14 .
cited
Cited "see"
Seaman-Andwall Corp. v. Wright Machine Corp.
See United States v. Silliman, 167 F.2d 607, 620-621 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 825 , 69 S.Ct. 48 , 93 L.Ed. 379 (1948).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Hendry Corporation
(2×)
See United States v. Silliman, 167 F.2d 607 (3d cir.), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 825 , 69 S.Ct. 48 , 93 L.Ed. 379 (1948). 54 The question thus becomes whether by enacting the Miller Act in 1935 the Congress created an exception to the operation of 1738.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Temple
See discussion in United States v. Silliman, 3 Cir., 1948, 167 F.2d 607 , certiorari denied 1948, 335 U.S. 825 , 69 S.Ct. 48 , 93 L.Ed. 379 .
cited
Cited "see"
William Whitman Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.
See Buromin Co. v. National Aluminate Corp., D.C., 70 F.Supp. 214 , and United States v. Silliman, 3 Cir., 167 F.2d 607 , certiorari denied 335 U.S. 825 , 69 S.Ct. 48 , 93 L.Ed. 379 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. The State of Florida and Gulf Power Company, John R. Tucker
See also, United States v. Silliman, 3rd Cir. 1948, 167 F.2d 607 , cert. den. 335 U.S. 825 , 69 S.Ct. 48 , 93 L.Ed. 379 (1948). 10 This court then finds that the United States is not subject to the defenses of laches, waiver or estoppel by virtue of its sovereign immunity and that it is performing a governmental function in ensuring that this land is properly used as a public park.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Viehweg v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
A judgment against one joint tort-feasor is no bar to an action against another tort-feasor. 3 Barron and Holtzoff, § 1192; see, also, United States v. Silliman, 3 Cir., 167 F.2d 607, 613 , certiorari denied 335 U.S. 825 , 69 S.Ct. 48 , 93 L.Ed. 379 . “ * * * a judgment against one without satisfaction is no bar to an action against any one of the other wrongdoers.” Sessions v. Johnson, 95 U.S. 347, 349 , 24 L.Ed. 596, 597 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Silliman
v.
Silliman
No. 174.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1948.
Solicitor General Perlman for the United States., Frederic M. P. Pearse, Sherwood D. Sil-liman and Reuben D. Silliman for respondent.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1) · Federal Circuit (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.