E. Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 341 U.S. 901 (1951). · Go Syfert
E. Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 341 U.S. 901 (1951). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Roach v. Comptroller of the Treasury (md, 1992-08-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Roach v. Comptroller of the Treasury
Md. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Reiling v. Lacy, 93 F.Supp. 462, 470-471 (D.Md.1950), appeal dismissed, 341 U.S. 901 , 71 S.Ct. 614 , 95 L.Ed. 1341 (1951).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Eastern Air Lines v. C.A.B., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 331 , 185 F.2d 426 (1950), vacated as moot, 341 U.S. 901 , 71 S.Ct. 613 , 95 L.Ed. 1341 (1951); American Airlines, Inc. v. C.A.B., 97 U.S.App.D.C. 324 , 231 F.2d 483 (1956).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Wien Air Alaska, Inc., Alaska Airlines Master Executive Council, Intervenor. Bp Alaska, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Wien Air Alaska, Inc., Alaska Airlines Master Executive Council, Intervenor
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Eastern Air Lines v. C.A.B., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 331 , 185 F.2d 426 (1950), vacated as moot, 341 U.S. 901 , 71 S.Ct. 613 , 95 L.Ed. 1341 (1951); American Airlines, Inc. v. C.A.B., 97 U.S.App.D.C. 324 , 231 F.2d 483 (1956). 38 Intervenor Wien contends that the CAB performed only an interpretive function and that all statutory provisions dealing with certificate amendments and enforcement proceedings are irrelevant.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Clarence Eisen v. Oliver C. Eastman
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Reiling v. Lacey, 93 F.Supp. 462 (D.Md. 1950), appeal dismissed, 341 U.S. 901 , 71 S.Ct. 614 , 95 L.Ed. 1341 (1951); Abernathy v. Carpenter, 208 F.Supp. 793 (W.D.Mo.1962) [alternative ground], aff’d, 373 U.S. 241 , 83 S.Ct. 1295 , 10 L.Ed.2d 409 (1963); Gray v. Morgan, 371 F.2d 172 (7 Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1033 , 87 S.Ct. 1484 , 18 L.Ed.2d 596 (1967); Bussie v. Long, 383 F.2d 766 (5 Cir. 1967); Hornbeak v. Hamm, 283 F.Supp. 549 (M.D.Ala.), aff’d, 393 U.S. 9 , 89 S.Ct. 47 , 21 L.Ed.2d 14 (1968).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nebraska Department of Aeronautics v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Frontier Airlines, Inc., Intervenor
8th Cir. · 1962 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Eastern Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1950, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 331 , 185 F.2d 426, 428 , vacated with directions to dismiss as moot, 341 U.S. 901 , 71 S.Ct. 613 , 95 L.Ed. 1341 and American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1956, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 324 , 231 F.2d 483 , 487-8. 16 A review of the legislative history of the Act and of its predecessor, the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 977 , as amended, with particular emphasis upon the 1938 Act’s §§ 401 (k) and 401(h), former 49 U.S.C.A. § 481 (k) and (h), substantially identical with § 401 (j) and § 401(g) of the pre…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
v.
Civil Aeronautics Board
No. 567.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 9, 1951.
341 U.S. 901
E. Smythe Gambrell and W. Glen Harlan for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Emory T. Nunneley, Jr. and Warren L. Sharfman for the Civil Aeronautics Board, and Charles H. Murchison for Capital Airlines, Inc., respondents.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Per Curiam: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that Court with directions to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground

that the cause is moot.