green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Martin v. State
See Chiarella v. United States, 341 U.S. 946 , 71 S.Ct. 1004 , 95 L.Ed. 1370 (1951) (per curiam); see also Imbesi v. Carpenter Realty Corp., 357 Md. 375 , 380 n. 2, 744 A.2d 549 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mabel A. Akers v. Anthony J. Principi
(2×)
See also Chiarella v. United States, 341 U.S. 946 (1951) (remand based on consideration of the record as well as confession of error by the Solicitor General); Penner v. United States, 399 U.S. 522 (1970) (remand based on an independent review of the record and confession of error by the Solicitor General).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. Chater
(2×)
See, e. g., Chiarella v. United States, 341 U. S. 946 (1951) (" [u]pon consideration of the record and *183 the confession of error by the Solicitor General," remanding to the District Court for resentencing) (emphasis added); Penner v. United States, 399 U. S. 522 (1970) ("[o]n the basis of a confession of error by the Solicitor General and of an independent review of the record," remanding to the District Court "with instructions to dismiss the indictment").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
California
v.
California
No. 11.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1951.
341 U.S. 946
Consideration, Jackson, Question, Took.
Published
The report of the Special Master under the order of June 27, 1949, has been received and filed. Briefs of the parties in relation thereto may be filed on or before July 16, next, and reply briefs on or before August 6, next.
Mr. Justice Jackson and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this question.