Cent. R.R. v. Dir., Div. of Tax Appeals of the Dep't of the Treasury, 342 U.S. 936 (1952). · Go Syfert
Search
Cent. R.R. v. Dir., Div. of Tax Appeals of the Dep't of the Treasury, 342 U.S. 936 (1952). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Motor Club of Iowa v. Department of Transportation (iowa, 1978-04-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Motor Club of Iowa v. Department of Transportation
Iowa · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lord v. Henderson, 105 Cal.App.2d 426, 431 , 234 P.2d 197, 203 (1951), appeal dismissed, 342 U.S. 937 , 72 S.Ct. 561 , 96 L.Ed. 697 (1952).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tredwell A. Harrison and M. Gale Harrison v. William G. Brooks
1st Cir. · 1971 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pyeatte v. Board of Regents, 102 F.Supp. 407 (W.D.Okla.1951), aff’d per curiam, 342 U.S. 936 , 72 S.Ct. 567 , 96 L.Ed. 696 (1952) (case involving interference with boarding house business; distinction not mentioned). 4 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Chesapeake Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States
D. Maryland · 1959 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Riss & Co., Inc. v. United States, D.C., 100 F.Supp. 468 , affirmed 342 U.S. 937 , 72 S.Ct. 559 , 96 L.Ed. 697 , rehearing denied 343 U.S. 937 , 72 S.Ct. 769 , 96 L.Ed. 1344 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey
v.
Director, Division of Tax Appeals of the Department of the Treasury
No. 520.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1952.
342 U.S. 936
James D. Carpenter and Judson C. McLester, Jr. for appellant., Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Bejamin C. Van Tine, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
Are, Jackson, Noted, Should.
Published
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion .that probable jurisdiction should be noted.