green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Williams
See Kephart v. Kephart, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 373 , 380, 193 F.2d 677, 684 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 557 , 96 L.Ed. 702 (1952); Parhm v. Parhm, 2 Cal.App.3d 311 , 82 Cal.Rptr. 570, 572 (1972); Hauck v. Schuck, 143 Colo. 324 , 353 P.2d 79, 80 (1960); Riney v. Riney, 205 Kan. 671 , 473 P.2d 77, 80 (1970); cf. Slade v. Slade, 81 N.M. 462 , 468 P.2d 627, 629 (1970) (child support payments are judgments in installments but each becomes vested when due and unpaid and the statute of limitations on judgments runs from the moment it vests). 12 .
cited
Cited "see"
D. Nelsen & Sons, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See, Buffum v. Chase National Bank of City of New York, 192 F.2d 58, 61 (7th Cir. 1951) cert. denied 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 702 (1952); 34 Geo.Wash.L.Rev. at 778.
cited
Cited "see"
Campbell v. Campbell
See Kephwt v. Kephart, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 373 , 377-80, 193 F.2d 677, 681-84 (1951), cert, denied, 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 557 , 96 L.Ed. 702 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. Bell
See Buffum v. Chase National Bank of City of New York, 7 Cir. 1951, 192 F.2d 58 , (cert. denied, 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 702 ). 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 provides: “(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between — (1) citizens of different states; * * * ”.
cited
Cited "see"
John G. Straub v. Mrs. Josephine T. Straub
See Kephart v. Kephart, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 373 , 377, 193 F.2d 677, 680-681 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 557 , 96 L.Ed. 702 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garrity v. Conservation Commission
See also Attorney Gen. v. Industrial Nat’l Bank, 380 Mass. 533 , 536 n.4 (1980), quoting with approval Buffum v. Chase Nat’l Bank, 192 F.2d 58, 60-61 (7th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 944 (1952) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bank of America, N.A. v. Johnson
See, e.g., American Surety Co. v. Bank of California, 133 F.2d 160, 161-62 (9th Cir.1943) (predecessor statute) and Buffum v. Chase National Bank of the City of New York, 192 F.2d 58, 60 (7th Cir.1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 702 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carter v. Carter
Relying on the well-established principle that an order reducing alimony may not be made retroactive beyond the date when application for such relief was made, Rhodes v. Gilpin, 264 A.2d 497, 500 (D.C.1970); see also the leading case of Kephart v. Kephart, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 373 , 380, 193 F.2d 677, 684 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 557 , 96 L.Ed. 702 (1952), the wife argues that Judge Huhn’s nunc pro tunc order terminating alimony as of December 15, 1989, was contrary to law.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cefaratti v. Cefaratti
See also Kephart v. Kephart, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 373 , 380, 193 F.2d 677, 684 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 557 , 96 L.Ed. 702 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States National Bank v. Hill
See, e.g., Buffum v. Chase Nat'l Bank, 192 F.2d 58, 60 (7th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 702 (1952); Leonardi v. Chase Nat'l Bank, 81 F.2d 19, 22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 298 U.S. 677 , 56 S.Ct. 941 , 80 L.Ed. 1398 (1936); Berman v. Thomson, 284 F.Supp. 521 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States National Bank v. Hill
See, e.g., Buffum v. Chase Nat’l Bank, 192 F.2d 58, 60 (7th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 702 (1952); Leonardi v. Chase Nat’l Bank, 81 F.2d 19, 22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 298 U.S. 677 , 56 S.Ct. 941 , 80 L.Ed. 1398 (1936); Berman v. Thomson, 284 F.Supp. 521 (N.D.Ill.1968); General Electric Credit Corp. v. James Talcott, Inc., 271 F.Supp. 699, 703 (S.D.N.Y.1966); National Union Fire Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Co.
See also United States Trust Co. v. Zelle, 191 F.2d 822 (8 Cir. 1951) (in railroad reorganization of Wisconsin Central, court applied the Vanston doctrine to deny interest at a rate exceeding that stated in bonds although allowed by state law and the bonds and interest were amply secured), cert. den. 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASS'N
See also Michigan National Bank v. Robertson, 372 U.S. 591 , 83 S.Ct. 914 , 9 L.Ed.2d 961 (1963), and Buffum v. Chase National Bank of City of New York, 192 F.2d 58 (7th Cir. 1951), cert. denied 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 702 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scholla v. Scholla (Two Cases)
(2×)
Compare Kephart v. Kephart, 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 373 , 193 F.2d 677 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 944 , 72 S.Ct. 557 , concurring opinion 89 U.S.App.D.C. 387 -389, 193 F.2d 691 -693.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Googins
v.
E. W. Hable & Sons
v.
E. W. Hable & Sons
No. 518.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1952.
Cecil C. Rotsch for petitioner., J. Chrys Dougherty, Joe R. Greenhill and Ireland Graves for respondent.
Published
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Tenth Supreme Judicial District, Certiorari denied.