green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Woodling v. Garrett Corp.
See Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 192 F.2d 217, 219 (2d Cir.1951), ce rt. denied, 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 (1952); Clark v. Harnischfeger Sales Corp., 238 A.D. 493, 495 , 264 N.Y.S. 873, 876 (2d Dep’t 1933); Wright v. Palmison, 237 A.D. 22, 22 , 260 N.Y.S. 812, 813 (2d Dep’t 1932).
discussed
Cited "see"
Susan Winter Woodling, as of the Estate of Albert D. Woodling, Deceased, Cross-Appellant v. The Garrett Corporation, Colt Electronics Company, Phoenix Aerospace, Inc., Lockheed Corporation and Texasgulf Aviation, Inc., the Garrett Corporation, Colt Electronics Company, Phoenix Aerospace, Inc., and Lockheed Corporation, Third Party the Garrett Corporation, Phoenix Aerospace, Inc., Third Party Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellants. v. Texasgulf, Inc. And Texasgulf Aviation, Inc., Third Party Defendants- Cross-Appellees
See Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 192 F.2d 217, 219 (2d Cir.1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 (1952); Clark v. Harnischfeger Sales Corp., 238 A.D. 493, 495 , 264 N.Y.S. 873, 876 (2d Dep't 1933); Wright v. Palmison, 237 A.D. 22, 22 , 260 N.Y.S. 812, 813 (2d Dep't 1932). 44 Since Connecticut is the principal place of business of TG, the court properly honored the parties' contractual choice of Connecticut law with regard to matters of substance, and looked to that law with respect to the issues of the validity and enforceability or voidability of the Release, an…
cited
Cited "see"
Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Quaker Oats Co.
See Creamette Co. v. Conlin, 191 F.2d 108, 112 (5th Cir. 1951), cert, denied, 342 U.S. 945 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
Complaint of American Export Lines, Inc.
The court of appeals approved the admission, stating that “ ‘the primary thrust of the provision is to exclude CAB reports which express agency views as to the probable cause of the accident.’ ” Id. at 196 , quoting Berguido v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 317 F.2d 628, 632 (3d Cir. 1963); see Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 192 F.2d 217 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 (1951).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rogow v. United States
See Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 2 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 217 , certiorari denied 1952, 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 ; O’Connor v. United States, 2 Cir., 1958, 251 F.2d 939 ; Citrola v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., supra. 17 In this case the inference of negligence is certainly as compelling as in the cases just cited.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joyce O'COnnOr as Administratrix of Benedict O'connor, Deceased v. United States
See Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 2 Cir., 192 F.2d 217 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 ; Bratt v. Western Air Lines, 10 Cir., 169 F.2d 214 ; Smith v. Pennsylvania Central Airlines Corp., D.C.D.C., 76 F.Supp. 940 , where numerous authorities are collected. 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux City, Iowa
Those cases solely involved questions regarding the admission or proper scope of testimony of NTSB investigators. 6 See Berguido v. Eastern Air Lines, *1211 Inc., 317 F.2d 628, 632 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 895 , 84 S.Ct. 170 , 11 L.Ed.2d 124 (1963) (admissibility of hearsay testimony of NTSB employee); Kline v. Martin, 345 F.Supp. 31, 32 (E.D.Va.1972) (sole question was whether NTSB employees had to answer certain propounded questions in discovery depositions); see also Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 192 F.2d 217, 220 (2d Cir.1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Televents of Florida, Inc. v. Telesat Cablevision, Inc.
Co., 154 Fla. 367 , 17 SO.2d 615 (Fla. 1944)); see also Creamette Co. v. Conlin, 191 F.2d 108 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 945 ((1952) (interpreting Florida law); Sun Coast v. Shupe, 52 So.2d 805 (Fla. 1951); American Bank of Merritt Island v. First American Bank and Trust, 455 So.2d 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), rev. denied, 461 So.2d 114 (Fla. 1984); Stagg Shop of Miami, Inc. v. Moss, 120 So.2d 39 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stanley Gafford v. Trans-Texas Airways
See also Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc., 192 F.2d 217 , C.A. 2, cert. denied 342 U.S. 945 , 72 S.Ct. 558 , 96 L.Ed. 703 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chesapeake Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States
See also Riss & Co., Inc. v. United States, D.C., 100 F.Supp. 468 , affirmed 342 U.S. 937 , 72 S.Ct. 559 , 96 L.Ed. 697 , rehearing denied 343 U.S. 937 , 72 S.Ct. 769 , 96 L.Ed. 1344 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis, Trustee
v.
B. F. Avery & Sons Co.
v.
B. F. Avery & Sons Co.
No. 537.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1952.
J. Madden Hatcher and Theo J. McGee for petitioner.., MaxF. Goldstein and Leonard Farkas for respondent.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.