green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company United Artists Theatres, Inc. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. Paramount Pictures Corporation Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. Warner Bros. Distributing Corp. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. Avco Embassy Pictures Corp. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. United Artists Corporation Buena Vista Distributing Co., Inc., Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company United Artists Theatres, Inc. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. United Artists Corporation, Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company American Multi-Cinema, Inc. United Artists Corporation
Since consistently bad business judgment is not to be expected from able and experienced corporate decisionmakers, only the conspiratorial inference is plausible. 52 Southway Theatres, Inc. v. Georgia Theatre Co., 672 F.2d 485, 501 (5th Cir.1982) (appendix--district court analysis); see Milgram v. Loew's, Inc., 192 F.2d 579, 583 (3d Cir.1951), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 929 , 72 S.Ct. 762 , 96 L.Ed. 1339 (1952). 53 Harkins attempts to raise a triable issue of fact regarding the quality of its bids by comparing the terms it offered with those of the licensed split member for forty top-grossing film…
discussed
Cited "see"
Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp.
Southway Theatres, Inc. v. Georgia Theatre Co., 672 F.2d 485, 501 (5th Cir.1982) (appendix — district court analysis); see Milgram v. Loew’s, Inc., 192 F.2d 579, 583 (3d Cir.1951), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 929 , 72 S.Ct. 762 , 96 L.Ed. 1339 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
Delaware Valley Marine Supply Co. v. American Tobacco Co.
See Milgram v. Loew’s Inc., 192 F.2d 579, 585 (3 Cir. 1951), cert. denied 343 U.S. 929 , 72 S.Ct. 762 , 96 L.Ed. 1339 (1952). . 66 F.Supp. 323 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1946), modified 334 U.S. 131 , 68 S.Ct. 915 , 92 L.Ed. 1260 (1948), on remand 85 F.Supp. 881 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1949). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Delaware Valley Marine Supply Company v. American Tobacco Company
Compare Brown v. Western Massachusetts Theatres, Inc., 288 F.2d 302, 304-305 (1 Cir., 1961) 23 See Milgram v. Loew's Inc., 192 F.2d 579, 585 (3 Cir. 1951), cert. denied 343 U.S. 929 , 72 S.Ct. 762 , 96 L.Ed. 1339 (1952) 24 66 F.Supp. 323 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1946), modified 334 U.S. 131 , 68 S.Ct. 915 , 92 L.Ed. 1260 (1948), on remand 85 F. Supp. 881 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1949) 25 The Reynolds' contact with the plaintiff through its local representative, Comey, was not "automatic" in nature.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Loew's Incorporated
v.
Milgram
v.
Milgram
No. 653.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1952.
Wm. A. Schnader, Bernard G. Segal and Abraham L. Freedman for petitioners. Albert M. Cohen for respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.