green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Diep v. Rivas
See Beck v. Downey, 191 F.2d 150 (9th Cir.1951), vacated on other grounds, 343 U.S. 912 , 72 S.Ct. 646 , 96 L.Ed. 1328 , reaff'd, 198 F.2d 626 , cert. denied, 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 170 , 97 L.Ed. 678 (1952); Webb v. Voirol, 773 F.2d 208, 212 (8th Cir.1985) (applying then Missouri law; recognizing majority rule to be contrary to holding); Reliable Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.
(2×)
See ante, at 834-836 (citing, e. g., Dickinson v. Burnham, 197 F. 2d 973 (CA2 1952), cert. denied, 344 U. S. 875 (1952), an investors' suit for the return of misused funds); ante, at 837 (citing, e. g., Morrison v. Warren, 174 Misc. 233, 234 , 20 N. Y.
cited
Cited "see"
Pruitt v. Allied Chemical Corp.
See Dickinson v. Burnham, 197 F.2d 973 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 169 , 97 L.Ed. 678 (1952); Daar v. Yellow Cab Co., 67 Cal.2d 695 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 433 P.2d 732 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Union Oil Company of California v. The Honorable Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America
Nevertheless, Union points to the distinction between a suspension and a revocation, asserting that the Secretary did not in fact merely suspend operations, because a suspension by definition possesses a “temporary nature.” United Air Lines, Inc. v. CAB, 198 F.2d 100, 108 (7th Cir. 1952); see Western Air Lines, Inc. v. CAB, 196 F.2d 933, 935-36 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 167 , 97 L.Ed. 677 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stella v. Kaiser
See Dickinson v. Burnham, 2 Cir., 197 F.2d 973 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 169 , 97 L.Ed. 678 , and proposed Rule 23(d) in Preliminary Draft of Proposed Amendments to Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Courts, May 1954, pp. 15-17, discussed in Wright, Amendments to the Federal Rules: The Function of a Continuing Rules Committee, 7 Vand.L.Rev. 521, 539-540. 4 Plaintiff asserts, however, that the settlement itself was procured by fraud and that the Michigan decree is subject to attack for failure to decide this issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Stella v. Kaiser
See Dickinson v. Burnham, 2 Cir., 197 F.2d 973 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 169 , 97 L.Ed. 678 , and proposed Rule 23(d) in Preliminary Draft of Proposed Amendments to Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Courts, May 1954, pp. 15-17, discussed in Wright, Amendments to the Federal Rules; The Function of a Continuing Rules Committee, 7 Vand.L.Rev. 521, 539-540.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Football League v. National Football League
(2×)
See, e.g., Monticello Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co., 197 F.2d 629, 632 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 168 , 97 L.Ed. 678 (1952) (exclusion upheld since nothing in prior antitrust conspiracy affected plaintiff).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Georgia Webb v. Sue Ann Martin Voirol, Helen A. Martin v. Sue Ann Martin Voirol
See, e.g., Beck v. Downey, 191 F.2d 150, 152 (9th Cir.1951), vacated and remanded, 343 U.S. 912 , 72 S.Ct. 646 , 96 L.Ed. 1328 (1952), readopted in 198 F.2d 626 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 170 , 97 L.Ed. 678 (1952); 4 Bullock v. Expressmen’s Mutual Life Insurance Co., 234 N.C. 254, 257-59 , 67 S.E.2d 71, 74-75 (1951).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Northern District of California \Dalkon Shield\" IUD Products Liability Litigation"
Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 23.35[2] (2d ed. 1980); see also Dickinson v. Burnham, 197 F.2d 973 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 169 , 97 L.Ed. 678 (1952). 34 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services Administration
(2×)
See, e. g., Dickinson v. Burnham, 197 F.2d 973, 980-81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 169 , 97 L.Ed. 678 (1952); Developments, supra, at 1524-25.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Polakoff v. Delaware Steeplechase and Race Association
See, e. g., the discussions in Dickinson v. Burnham, 2 Cir. 1952, 197 F.2d 973, 979 , cert. denied, 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 169 , 97 L.Ed. 678 ; Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation v. Nisley, 10 Cir. 1961, 300 F.2d 561 , 587-590, pet. cert. dism. 1963, 371 U.S. 801 , 83 S.Ct. 13 , 9 L.Ed.2d 46 ; Note, Federal Class Actions; A Suggested Revision of Rule 23, 46 Col.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William Gart v. Albert M. Cole
See, e. g., Dickinson v. Burnham, 2 Cir., 197 F. 2d 973, 979 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 169 , 97 L.Ed. 678 ; Oppenheimer v. F. J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gart v. Cole
See, e. g., Dickinson v. Burnham, 2 Cir., 197 F.2d 973, 979 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 875 , 73 S.Ct. 169 , 97 L.Ed. 678 ; Oppenheimer v. F. J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Western Air Lines, Inc.
v.
Civil Aeronautics Board
v.
Civil Aeronautics Board
No. 337.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1952.
Hugh W. Darling for petitioner., Acting Solicitor General Stern, Acting Assistant Attorney General Clapp and Ralph S. Spritzer for the Civil Aeronautics Board; and Albert F. Grisard for the Bonanza Air Lines, Inc., respondents.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.