Adams v. Maryland, 346 U.S. 864 (1953). · Go Syfert
Search
Adams v. Maryland, 346 U.S. 864 (1953). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
97 citation events across 37 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sutain v. Commissioner (tax, 1979-10-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Sutain v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Falsone v. United States, 205 F. 2d 734 , 739 (5th Cir. 1953) , cert. denied 346 U.S. 864 (1953) ; United States v. Ponder, 475 F. 2d 37 (5th Cir. 1973) .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Cortese
3rd Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Falsone v. United States, 205 F.2d 734, 742 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 (1953). 8 The district court's order shall be affirmed. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 2 Local Rule 202 provided, in pertinent part: (d) Every attorney effecting the recovery of damages for personal injuries, whether by settlement or through litigation, shall forthwith fill out, in duplicate, a statement showing in reasonable detail the disposition of the amount received.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Cortese
3rd Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Falsone v. United States, 205 F.2d 734, 742 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 (1953).
cited Cited "see" Anderson v. Internal Revenue Service
D. Wyo. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Falsone v. United States, 205 F.2d 734 (5th Cir. 1953), cert. den. 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 (1953).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Grand Jury, and Henry M. Huffman, President, H & M Construction Company
5th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Falsone v. United States, 205 F.2d 734 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 (1953). 2 . 309 U.S. 323 , 60 S.Ct. 540 , 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940). 3 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jaskiewicz
E.D. Pa. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Falsone v. United States, 5 Cir. 1953, 205 F.2d 734 , cert. den. 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 ; In the Matter of Fahey, D.C.Ky.1961, 192 F.Supp. 492 , aff’d 6 Cir. 1961, 300 F.2d 383 .” Although the Court’s decision, as manifested by the above quotation, involved communications which were prior to the Pennsylvania statute conferring the privilege, the Court did cite the Falsone case with approval.
cited Cited "see" In Re Rashba & Pokart
S.D.N.Y. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
United States v. Pizzo, 260 F.Supp. 216, at 221 (S.D.N.Y.1966); see Falsone v. United States, 205 F.2d 734, at 739 (5th Cir. 1953), cert. denied 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 (1953).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Bowman
M.D. Penn. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Falsone v. United States, 5 Cir. 1953, 205 F.2d 734 , cert. den. 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 ; In the Matter of James E.
cited Cited "see" Jack Lustman and Ida Lustman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
3rd Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Falsone v. United States, 5 Cir. 1953, 205 F.2d 734 , cert. den. 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 ; In the Matter of James E.
cited Cited "see" Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. Colton
2d Cir. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See Falsone v. United States, 205 F.2d 734 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 (1953).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. King
E.D.N.Y · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Falsone v. United States, 205 F.2d 734 (5th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 (state taxpayer-accountant privilege not recognized in tax investigation); Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1962) (federal, rather than state, law of attorney-client privilege applicable in federal tax investigation); In re Albert Lindley Lee Memorial Hospital, 209 F.2d 122 (2d Cir. 1953), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States of America and James M. Sinda, Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Marvin L. Tratner, United States of America and James M. Sinda, Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue Service, Petitioners-Cross-Appellants v. Marvin L. Tratner
7th Cir. · 1975 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Colton v. United States, 2 Cir., 306 F.2d 633, 636 (1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963), and Falsone v. United States, 5 Cir., 205 F.2d 734 , 739--742, cert. denied, 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 (1953) (federal law) with Baird v. Koerner, 9 Cir., 279 F.2d 623 , 627--629 (1960) (state law).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Tratner
7th Cir. · 1975 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Colton v. United States, 2 Cir., 306 F.2d 633, 636 (1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963), and Falsone v. United States, 5 Cir., 205 F.2d 734 , 739 — 742, cert. denied, 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 (1953) (federal law) with Baird v. Koerner, 9 Cir., 279 F.2d 623, 627-629 (1960) (state law).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Kennedy v. Rubin
N.D. Ill. · 1966 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Falsone v. United States, (5th Cir., 1953) 205 F.2d 734, 742 , cert. den. 346 U.S. 864 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 375 (1953).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adams
v.
Maryland
No. 271.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 26, 1953.
346 U.S. 864
James A. Cobb and George E. C. Hayes for petitioner. Edward D. E. Rollins, Attorney General of Maryland, J. Edgar Harvey, Deputy Attorney General, and W. Giles Parker, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Published

Court of Appeals of Maryland. Certiorari granted limited to question No. I presented by the petition for the writ [i. e., whether 18 U. S. C. § 3486 “renders inadmissible testimony given by Adams before a Senate Committee in a criminal case in the Maryland Courts and in turn avoids a conviction which has to rely upon the testimony thus admitted?”].