green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.3 score
“telechron" infringed by "telicon”
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Miller Brewing Co. v. Carling O'Keefe Breweries of Canada, Ltd.
telechron" infringed by "telicon
discussed
Cited "see"
Lane v. Meserve
See Wetherbee v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Ry., 191 F.2d 302, 311 (7th Cir. 1951), cert. denied 346 U.S. 867 (1953); Mullins v. Seals, 562 F.2d 326, 328-329 (4th Cir. 1977) (construing Virginia law); Riksem v. Hollister, 96 Idaho 15, 16 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Presley v. Russen
See Q-Tips, Inc., 206 F.2d at 147 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 867 , 74 S.Ct. 106 , 98 L.Ed. 377 (1953).
cited
Cited "see"
Schmid Laboratories v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.
See Q-Tips Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson, 206 F.2d 144, 147 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 867 , 74 S.Ct. 106 , 98 L.Ed. 377 (1953).
cited
Cited "see"
Fotomat Corp. v. Photo Drive-Thru, Inc.
See Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson, 206 F.2d 144 (3d Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 867 , 74 S.Ct. 106 , 98 L.Ed. 377 (1953); G.
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. Hackett
See Whittington v. Johnston, 201 F.2d 810 (5th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 867 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 377 ; Miles v. Armstrong, 207 F.2d 284 (7th Cir. 1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
Virgil Norton, Virgil Wesley and James Chapman v. James P. McShane
(2×)
See Whittington v. Johnston, 5 Cir.1953, 201 F.2d 810 , cert. denied, 346 U.S. 867 , 74 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed. 377 ; Dunn v. Gazzola, 1 Cir.1954, 216 F.2d 709, 711 ; Miles v. Armstrong, 7 Cir. 1953, 207 F.2d 284 ; Morgan v. Null, S.D.N.Y.1954, 120 F.Supp. 803 . 13 27 For the reasons stated herein the district court's dismissal of the three suits is 28 Affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
General Controls Co. v. Hi-G, Inc
Lanolin Plus Cosmetics, Inc. v. Marzall, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 349 , 196 F.2d 591, 592 (1952) cert, denied 344 U.S. 823 , 73 S. Ct. 22 , 97 L.Ed. 640 (1952); See Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson, 206 F.2d 144, 148 (3 Cir., 1953) cert, denied 346 U.S. 867 , 74 S.Ct. 106 , 98 L.Ed. 377 (1953). 1 When the interests of parties in the right to use a mark do not clash head-on 2 because the products on which the mark is used are not the same, that the use of the mark by a defendant on its products and labels and in its advertising may be “likely to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive purchasers as …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holiday Inns, Inc. v. Trump
See also Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson, 206 F.2d 144, 147-48 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 867 , 74 S.Ct. 106 , 98 L.Ed. 377 (1953); Caesars World, Inc. v. Caesar’s Palace, supra, 490 F.Supp. at 823-24 ; Fotomat Corp. v. Drive-Thru, Inc., 425 F.Supp. 693, 703 (E.D.Pa.1977); McNeil Laboratories, Inc. v. American Home Products Corp., 416 F.Supp. 804, 806 (D.N.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Johnson & Johnson
v.
Q-Tips, Inc.
v.
Q-Tips, Inc.
No. 288.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 26, 1953.
Kenneth Perry and Chester T. Lane for petitioner. W. Brown Morton for respondent.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Citer courts: W.D. New York (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.