green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Litigation; Graham v. Philips, et al.
See Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co., 207 F.2d 113 (5th Cir. 1953), Cert. denied, 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 476 , 98 L.Ed. 1069 (1954); Wolgin v. Atlas United Financial Corp., 397 F.Supp. 1003 (E.D.Pa.1975), Aff'd without opinion, 530 F.2d 966 (3d Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Litigation; Ruiz v. Philips, et al.
See Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co., 207 F.2d 113 (5th Cir. 1953), Cert. denied, 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 476 , 98 L.Ed. 1069 (1954); Wolgin v. Atlas United Financial Corp., 397 F.Supp. 1003 (E.D.Pa.1975), Aff'd without opinion, 530 F.2d 966 (3d Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Litigation; Papsun v. Philips, et al.
See Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co., 207 F.2d 113 (5th Cir. 1953), Cert. denied, 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 476 , 98 L.Ed. 1069 (1954); Wolgin v. Atlas United Financial Corp., 397 F.Supp. 1003 (E.D.Pa.1975), Aff'd without opinion, 530 F.2d 966 (3d Cir. 1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis
See Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co., 207 F. 2d 113, 114 (CA5 1953), cert. denied, 347 U. S. 912 (1954).
cited
Cited "see"
Lester v. Resolution Trust Corp.
See Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co., 207 F.2d 113,116 (5th Cir.1953), cert, denied, 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 476 , 98 L.Ed. 1069 (1954).
cited
Cited "see"
Lester v. Resolution Trust Corporation
See Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co., 207 F.2d 113, 116 (5th Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 476 , 98 L.Ed. 1069 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Federation of Government Employees, Council 214, Afl-Cio v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
(2×)
See United States Gypsum Co., 94 N.L.R.B. 112 , 113 n. 7, amended, 97 N.L.R.B. 889 (1951), mod., 206 F.2d 410 (5th Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 475 , 98 L.Ed. 1068 (1954); 2 The Developing Labor Law 1406 (Morris ed. 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ca 79-3053 Publicker Industries, Inc. And Continental Distilling Corporation v. Roman Ceramics Corporation
See Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co., 207 F.2d 113 (5th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 476 , 98 L.Ed. 1069 (1954); Wolgin v. Atlas United Financial Corp., 397 F.Supp. 1003 (E.D.Pa.1975), aff’d without opinion, 530 F.2d 966 (3d Cir. 1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.
See Switzer Bros., Inc. v. Locklin, 207 F.2d 483 (7th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 477 , 98 L.Ed. 1069 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
The A. H. Emery Company v. Marcan Products Corporation, Marshall Control Products Corp., Hugh A. Mills, Ronald R. Marshall, and David E. Golding
See Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co.. 207 F.2d 113 (5 Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 476 , 98 L.Ed. 1069 (1954), But on the disposition made, we need express no opinion on the point.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sandra & Dennis Fishing Corp.
United States v. Gavagan, 5 Cir., 1960, 280 F.2d 319 , cert. den. 364 U.S. 933 , 81 S.Ct. 379 , 5 L.Ed.2d 365 ; see Biggs, J., dissenting, in P. Dougherty Co. v. United States, 3 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 626, 642-650 , cert. den. 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 476 , 98 L.Ed. 1068 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blumenthal v. United States
Compare P. Dougherty Co. v. United States, 3 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 626 , certiorari denied 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 476 , 98 L.Ed. 1068 ; Rayonier, Inc. v. United States, 1957, 352 U.S. 315 , 77 S.Ct. 374 , 1 L.Ed.2d 354 ; Frank v. United States, 3 Cir., 1957, 250 F.2d 178 , certiorari denied 356 U.S. 962 , 78 S.Ct. 1000 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1069 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Mccloskey And Company, Inc.
See also N.L.R.B. v. Epstein, 3 Cir., 1953, 203 F.2d 482 , certiorari denied 1954, 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 474 , 98 L.Ed. 1068 . 20 The last point raised both by the union and the company questions the power of the Board to order back pay for Getta Owens because he had been reemployed by the company as a laborer about three weeks after the discriminatory discharge.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. McCloskey & Co.
See also N.L.R.B. v. Epstein, 3 Cir., 1953, 203 F.2d 482 , certi-orari denied 1954, 347 U.S. 912 , 74 S.Ct. 474 , 98 L.Ed. 1068 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Epstein, doing business as Top Mode Manufacturing Co.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 210.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 8, 1954.
Samuel A. Schreckengaust, Jr. for petitioners., Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Dominick L. Manoli and Harvey B. Diamond for respondent.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.