green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State ex rel. Hoyle v. City of Grants Pass
See General Electric Co. v. Porter , 208 F.2d 805 , 811-12 (9th Cir. 1953), cert. den. , 347 U.S. 951 , 74 S.Ct. 676 , 98 L.Ed. 1097 (1954) (describing the "two-platoon system," where "firemen are on duty for a 24 hour shift, off 24 hours, with each sixth shift off," and explaining that, under such a schedule, "[i]n 1/4 of the weeks [the firefighters] were required to be at the fire station 48 hours, in 1/2 of the weeks 72 hours, and in 1/4 of the weeks 96 hours").
cited
Cited "see"
Unimex Logistics, LLC and Margo Logistics LP v. Tim Neff Towing, Inc. D/B/A TNT Wrecker Service
See U.S. v. Savage Truck Line, Inc., 209 F.2d 442, 445-47 (4th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 952 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Specialty Trailers, Inc. J. Marvin Williams, Jr. And Richard Kellerman D/B/A JK Trucking v. Jackson & Simmen Drilling Company and Lexington Insurance Company
Code Ann. § 5.001 (a)(1) (Vernon 1999). 65 … Common Carrier Motor Freight Ass'n v. NCH Corp., 788 S.W.2d 207, 209 (Tex. App.—Austin 1990, writ denied); see United States v. Savage Truck Line Inc., 209 F.2d 442 , 445–47 (4th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 952 (1954). 66 … Mo. Pac.
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Specialty Trailers, Inc. J. Marvin Williams, Jr. And Richard Kellerman D/B/A JK Trucking v. Jackson & Simmen Drilling Company and Lexington Insurance Company
Code Ann. § 5.001 (a)(1) (Vernon 1999). 65: Common Carrier Motor Freight Ass'n v. NCH Corp. , 788 S.W.2d 207, 209 (Tex. App.—Austin 1990, writ denied); see United States v. Savage Truck Line Inc. , 209 F.2d 442 , 445–47 (4th Cir. 1953), cert. denied , 347 U.S. 952 (1954). 66: Mo. Pac.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schiffer
See United States v. Accardo, 113 F.Supp. 783, 785 (D.N.J.), aff'd, 208 F.2d 632 (3d Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 952 , 74 S.Ct. 677 , 98 L.Ed. 1098 (1954). 46 .Indeed, the grave nature of the crime alleged would be sufficient to raise serious questions in an examiner’s mind as to Schiffer’s good moral character.
discussed
Cited "see"
Arnold J. Owens v. Local No. 169, Association of Western Pulp and Paper Workers, Third-Party-Defendant v. Itt Rayonier, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant
It imposes upon the courts the task of finding what the arrangement was. 36 Skidmore, 323 U.S. at 137 , 65 S.Ct. at 163 (remanding the case for further evaluations and fact-finding) (emphasis added). 37 In Rousseau, the Fifth Circuit found that although the employee barge workers did not like the conditions imposed by the company, there was an agreement nonetheless because the employees had been informed of the policy and continued to work under those terms. 805 F.2d at 1248 ("continuance of employment can be evidence of an implied agreement to the terms of that employment"); accord General El…
discussed
Cited "see"
Owens v. Local No. 169, Ass'n of Western Pulp & Paper Workers
In Rousseau, the Fifth Circuit found that although the employee barge workers did not like the conditions imposed by the company, there was an agreement nonetheless because the employees had been informed of the policy and continued to work under those terms. 805 F.2d at 1248 (“continuance of employment can be evidence of an implied agreement to the terms of that employment”); accord General Electric Co. v. Porter, 208 F.2d 805, 813 (9th Cir. 1953) (Ninth Circuit held unilateral action of an employer was impliedly accepted when employees reported to work and worked pursuant to employer’s…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lisa A. Hultgren Victoria M. Smith and Daniel R. Turner v. County of Lancaster, Nebraska, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nebraska
See General Electric Co. v. Porter, 208 F.2d 805, 816 (9th Cir.1954), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 951 , 74 S.Ct. 676 , 98 L.Ed. 1097 (1954); Dalheim, 712 F.Supp. at 540-41 ; Wyatt v. Holtville Alfalfa Mills, 106 F.Supp. 624, 633 (S.D.Cal.1952), remanded on other grounds, 230 F.2d 398 (9th Cir.1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, Plaintiff v. El Paso Natural Gas Company
See General Electric Co. v. Porter, 208 F.2d 805, 816 (9th Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 951 , 74 S.Ct. 676 , 98 L.Ed. 1097 (1954) (important distinction between employees “required to leave their homes” for on-call duty and employees “who make their homes on their employer’s premises”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nash v. Reedel
See United States v. Accardo, 113 F.Supp. 783 (D.N.J.), affirmed, 208 F.2d 632 (3d Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 952 , 74 S.Ct. 677 , 98 L.Ed. 1098 (1954). 2 Assuming then as a general matter that collateral estoppel may be invoked as a defense to a § 1983 action where the plaintiff has been found guilty of criminal charges involving the same set of facts, the question is whether Nash is estopped on the facts of this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Akers Motor Lines, Inc. v. Peaslee Metal Products, Inc.
See United States v. Savage Truck Line, Inc., 209 F.2d 442 , 44 A.L.R.2d 984 (4th Cir. 1953), cert. den. 347 U.S. 952 , 74 S.Ct. 677 , 98 L.Ed 1098 (1954), 44 A.L.R.2d 984 , and the annotation at 44 A.L.R.2d 993 .
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Petition of Reginelli
See U.S. v. Accardo, 113 F. Supp. 783, 787 ( D.C.N.J. 1953), affirmed per curiam 208 F. 2 d 632 (3 Cir. 1953), certiorari denied 347 U.S. 952 , 74 S.Ct. 677 , 98 L.Ed. 1098 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kuerschner & Rauchwarenfabrik, A.G. v. New York Trust Co.
See Zwack v. Kraus Bros. & Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1950, 93 F.Supp. 963 -966; Republic of China v. National City Bank of New York, 2 Cir., 1951, 194 F.2d 170 (by implication although not considered in final holding: see 2 Cir., 208 F.2d 627 , certiorari denied 347 U.S. 951 , 74 S.Ct. 676 ; but cf. Koninklijke v. Lederfabriek “Oisterwijk” N. V. v. Chase Nat.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, Inc
“Indemnity turns upon what is equitable and fair in measuring the comparative responsibilities of these defendants, should both be held liable.” District of Columbia v. Nordstrom, 327 F.2d 863, 867 (D.C.Cir.1963); see also United States v. Savage Truck Line, 209 F.2d 442, 447 (4th Cir.1953) (“[T]he inquiry is always whether the difference in the gravity of the faults of the participants is so great as to throw the whole loss upon one.”), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 952 , 74 S.Ct. 677 , 98 L.Ed. 1098 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Taylor v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 209 F.2d 353 (9th Cir.1953), cert. denied 347 U.S. 952 , 74 S.Ct. 677 , 98 L.Ed. 1098 (1954).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co., Inc.
v.
Deal, Executors
v.
Deal, Executors
No. 608.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1954.
William S. Pritchard and Winston B. McCall for petitioner., Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Holland, Ellis N. Slack and Lee A. Jackson for respondents'.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.