green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Colan v. Continental Telecom, Inc.
See Abrams v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 450 F.2d 157, 159, 162 (2d Cir. 1971) (citing Roberts v. Eaton, 212 F.2d 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 827 , 75 S.Ct. 44 , 99 L.Ed. 652 (1954), aff'd, 411 U.S. 582 , 93 S.Ct. 1736 , 36 L.Ed.2d 503 (1973). 16 .
cited
Cited "see"
Lynam v. Livingston
See Roberts v. Eaton, 2 Cir., 1954, 212 F.2d 82 , at page 83, certiorari denied 348 U.S. 827 , 75 S. Ct. 44 , 99 L.Ed. 652 .
cited
Cited "see"
Nicholas Ferraiolo v. F. R. Newman
See Roberts v. Eaton, 2 Cir., 1954, 212 F.2d 82 , at page 83, cer-tiorari denied 348 U.S. 827 , 75 S.Ct. 44 , 99 L.Ed. 652 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Birdie R. Hudson v. Stuart L. Crenshaw, Collector of Internal Revenue, United States of America for the Eastern District of Virginia
See Milliken v. Gill, 4 Cir., 211 F.2d 869 , certiorari denied 348 U.S. 827 , 75 S.Ct. 47 ; for a thorough discussion of the problem in this regard also see Jewel Shop of Abbeville, South Carolina v. Pitts, 4 Cir., 218 F.2d 692 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Portnoy v. Seligman & Latz, Inc.
See also Roberts v. Eaton, 212 F.2d 82, 86 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 827 , 75 S.Ct. 44 , 99 L.Ed. 652 (1954) (The “cumulative effect” of several factors indicates that the “reclassification at bar could not possibly lend itself to the speculation encompassed by § 16(b).”; Shaw v. Dreyfus, 172 F.2d 140 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 907 , 69 S.Ct. 1048 , 93 L.Ed. 1719 (1949) (gifts gave insider no profit); Lewis v. Adler, 331 F.Supp. 1258 (S.D.N.Y.1971) (same); Truncale v. Blumberg, 80 F.Supp. 387 (S.D.N.Y.1948) *1193 (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Redington v. Touche Ross & Co.
Compare Blau v. Mission Corp., 212 F.2d 77, 81 (2 Cir.), Cert. denied, 347 U.S. 1016 (1954), and Roberts v. Eaton, 212 F.2d 82, 84 (2 Cir.), Cert. denied, 348 U.S. 827 (1954), with Studebaker v. Gittlin, 360 F.2d 692, 695 (2 Cir. 1966), and Greene v. Dietz, 247 F.2d 689, 695-98 (2 Cir. 1957) (concurring and dissenting opinions; per curiam opinion on rehearing).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Redington v. Touche Ross & Co.
Compare Blau v. Mission Corp., 212 F.2d 77, 81 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 1016 (1954), and Roberts v. Eaton, 212 F.2d 82, 84 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 827 (1954), with Studebaker v. Gittlin, 360 F.2d 692, 695 (2 Cir. 1966), and Greene v. Dietz, 247 F.2d 689, 695-98 (2 Cir. 1957) (concurring and dissenting opinions; per curiam opinion on rehearing).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kern County Land Co. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
(2×)
See, e. g., Roberts v. Eaton, 212 F. 2d 82 (CA2), cert. denied, 348 U. S. 827 (1954); Ferraiolo v. Newman, 259 F. 2d 342 (CA6 1958), cert. denied, 359 U. S. 927 (1959); Blau v. Max Factor & Co., 342 F. 2d 304 (CA9), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 892 (1965); Blau v. Lamb, supra ; Petteys v. Butler, 367 F. 2d 528 (CA8 1966), cert. denied, 385 U. S. 1006 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Co. of Delaware v. Trainor
See also Milliken v. Gill, 211 F.2d 869 (4th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 827 , 75 S.Ct. 47 , 99 L.Ed. 652 (1954), decided under 26 U.S.C. § 3653 , the predecessor of Section 7421. 8 The provisions of Section 7421(b) and its predecessors are not an absolute bar to the maintenance of a taxpayer’s suit, and under “extraordinary and exceptional circumstances,” an injunction may issue.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Company Of Delaware v. Edwin P. Trainor
See also Milliken v. Gill, 211 F.2d 869 (4th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 827 , 75 S.Ct. 47 , 99 L.Ed. 652 (1954), decided under 26 U.S.C. § 3653 , the predecessor of Section 7421. 8 18 The provisions of Section 7421(b) and its predecessors are not an absolute bar to the maintenance of a taxpayer's suit, and under "extraordinary and exceptional circumstances," an injunction may issue.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nichols v. Alker
See also Nichols v. Long Island Lighting Company, 2 Cir., 211 F.2d 392 , certiorari denied October 14, 1954, 348 U.S. 827 , 75 S.Ct. 45 , and petition for rehearing denied by the Supreme Court on November 15, 1954, 348 U.S. 884 , 75 S.Ct. 123 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roberts
v.
Eaton
v.
Eaton
No. 178.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1954.
Henry H. Shepard and Murray C. Bernays for petitioner., Inzer B. Wyatt and Francis Elwood Barkman for respondents.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.