Syres v. Oil Workers Int'l Union, Local No. 23, 350 U.S. 892 (1955). · Go Syfert
Syres v. Oil Workers Int'l Union, Local No. 23, 350 U.S. 892 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
155 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 50 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jacoby v. National Labor Relations Board (cadc, 2000-12-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Jacoby v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Syres v. Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers Local 23, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 152 , 100 L.Ed. 785 (1955)(mem.), rev’g 223 F.2d 739 (5th Cir. 1955).
discussed Cited "see" Robert T. Sisco v. Consolidated Rail Corp. And United Transportation Union
3rd Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See *1192 Syres v. Oil Workers International Union, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 152 , 100 L.Ed. 785 (1955) (per curiam); Humphrey v. Moore, 375 U.S. 335 , 84 S.Ct. 363 , 11 L.Ed.2d 370 (1964); Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 , 87 S.Ct. 903 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967); Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., 424 U.S. 554 , 96 S.Ct. 1048 , 47 L.Ed.2d 231 (1976).
cited Cited "see" Anderson v. UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERN. U., AFL-CIO
D. Minnesota · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Syres v. Oilworkers Local 23, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 152 , 100 L.Ed. 785 (1955). 4 .
discussed Cited "see" 3 Fair empl.prac.cas. 862, 4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 2, 3 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8324 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Jacksonville Terminal Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Syres v. Oil Workers Local 23, 1955, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 152 , 100 L.Ed. 785 , rev'g, 5 Cir., 223 F.2d 739 ; Local Union No. 12, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers v. NLRB, 5 Cir. 1966, 368 F.2d 12 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 837 , 88 S.Ct. 53 , 19 L.Ed.2d 99 ; Evans v. Local 2127, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, N.D.Ga.1969, 313 F.Supp. 1354, 1358-1359 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Syres v. Oil Workers Local 23, 1955, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 152 , 100 L.Ed. 785 , rev’g, 5 Cir., 223 F.2d 739 ; Local Union No. 12, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers v. NLRB, 5 Cir. 1966, 368 F.2d 12 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 837 , 88 S.Ct. 53 , 19 L.Ed.2d 99 ; Evans v. Local 2127, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, N.D.Ga.1969, 313 F. Supp. 1354, 1358-1359 .
discussed Cited "see" Directors Guild of America, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Cal. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Syres v. Oil Workers International Union (1956) 350 U.S. 892 [ 76 S.Ct. 152 , 100 L.Ed. 785 ]; Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman (1952) 345 U.S. 330 [ 73 S.Ct. 681 , 97 L.Ed. 1048 ]. 4 See Marshall v. International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union (1962) 57 Cal.2d 781 [ 22 Cal.Rptr. 211 , 371 P.2d 987 ]; Daniels v. Sanitarium Assn., Inc. (1963) 59 Cal.2d 602 [ 30 Cal.Rptr. 828 , 381 P.2d 652 ]. 5 “ [E]xclusion from the union may deprive the individual of various social benefits provided by the organization. . . .
discussed Cited "see" Addeo v. Dairymen's League Cooperative Ass'n
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Syres v. Oil Workers Int’l Union, 350 U. S. 892 , * * * reversing per curiam 223 F. 2d 739 (5th Cir. 1955); Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U. S. 768 * * * (1952); Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, 323 U. S. 210 * * * (1944); Steele v. Louisville & N. R.R., 323 U. S. 192 * * * (1944); cf. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman, 345 U. S. 330 , 337 * * * (1953).
discussed Cited "see" Hiller v. Liquor Salesmens' Union Local No. 2
2d Cir. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Syres v. Oil Workers Int'l Union, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 152 , 100 L.Ed. 785 , reversing per curiam 223 F.2d 739 (5th Cir. 1955); Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U.S. 768 , 72 S.Ct. 1022 , 96 L.Ed. 1283 (1952); Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, 323 U.S. 210 , 65 S.Ct. 235 , 89 L.Ed. 187 (1944); Steele v. Louisville & N.R.R., 323 U.S. 192 , 65 S.Ct. 226 , 89 L.Ed. 173 (1944); cf. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman, 345 U.S. 330, 337 , 73 S.Ct. 681 , 97 L.Ed. 1048 (1953).
discussed Cited "see" Hiller v. Liquor Salesmen's Union Local No. 2
2d Cir. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Syres v. Oil Workers Int’l Union, 350 U. S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 152 , 100 L.Ed. 785 , reversing per curiam 223 F.2d 739 (5th Cir. 1955); Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U.S. 768 , 72 S.Ct. 1022 , 96 L.Ed. 1283 (1952); Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, 323 U.S. 210 , 65 S.Ct. 235 , 89 L.Ed. 187 (1944); Steele v. Louisville & N. R.R., 323 U.S. 192 , 65 S.Ct. 226 , 89 L.Ed. 173 (1944); cf. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman, 345 U.S. 330, 337 , 73 S.Ct. 681 , 97 L.Ed. 1048 (1953).
discussed Cited "see" Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of America
W.D. Pa. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Goldberg in Humphrey v. Moore, supra f. n. 2, citing Syres v. Oil Workers Int’l Union, etc., 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 152 , 100 L.Ed. 785 , reversing 5 Cir., 223 F.2d 739 ; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U.S. 768 , 72 S.Ct. 1022 , 96 L.Ed. 1283 ; Steele v. Louisville & N. R.
examined Cited "see" Humphrey v. Moore (3×)
SCOTUS · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Syres v. Oil Workers Int'l Union, 350 U. S. 892 , reversing 223 F. 2d 739 ; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U. S. 768 ; Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, 323 U. S. 210 ; Steele v. Louisville & N. R.
cited Cited "see" Fred Thompson v. Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, an Unincorporated Railroad Labor Organization, National in Scope
4th Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Syres v. Oil Workers International Union, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 152 , 100 L.Ed. 785 (1955). 11 .
cited Cited "see" Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of America
Pa. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Syres v. Oil Workers Union, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S. Ct. 152 , 100 L.
cited Cited "see" In Re Fletcher's Estate
Okla. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wilson v. Simler, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S. Ct. 153 .
cited Cited "see" In Re Fletcher's Estate
Okla. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wilson v. Simler, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 153 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Foust (2×)
SCOTUS · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Syres v. Oil Workers, 350 U. S. 892 (1955); Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman, 345 U. S. 330 (1953); Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U. S., at 177 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Highway Truck Drivers and Helpers Local 107 v. Cohen
E.D. Pa. · 1960 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Syres v. Oil Workers International Union, 1955, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 152 , 100 L.Ed. 785 (his case appears to overrule Williams v. Yellow Cab Co., 3 Cir., 1952, 200 F.2d 302 , which had refused to extend the reasoning of the Steele case to cases involving the Taft-Hartley Act); Conley v. Gibson, 1957, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 ; Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman, 1953, 345 U.S. 330 , 73 S.Ct. 681 , 97 L.Ed. 1048 ; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 1952, 343 U.S. 768 , 72 S.Ct. 1022 , 96 L.Ed. 1283 ; Cunningham v. Erie Railroad Co., 2 Cir., 1959, 266 F.2d 411 ; McMu…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Jones
5th Cir. · 1956 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Syres v. Oil Workers International Union, 350 U.S. 892 , 76 S.Ct. 152 , reversing 5 Cir., 223 F.2d 739 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Syres
v.
Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 23
Roberson L. King for petitioners. Chris Dixie for the Oil Workers International Union, Local 23, et al., and Quentin Keith, David Proctor and Archie D. Cray for the Gulf Oil Corporation, respondents.
Cited by 116 opinions  |  Published

On petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings. Steele v. L. & N. R. Co., 323 U. S. 192; Tunstall v. Brotherhood, 323 U. S. 210; Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U. S. 768.