green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
3.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1979 ·
…it will not do to make the presumption . . . rebuttable and then make the standard of proof for rebuttal unattainably high. this is particularly true where, as here, the attorney must prove a negative, which is always a difficult burden to meet.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Intern. Union, Uaw v. Nat. Caucus, Lab. Com.
it will not do to make the presumption . . . rebuttable and then make the standard of proof for rebuttal unattainably high. this is particularly true where, as here, the attorney must prove a negative, which is always a difficult burden to meet.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
International Union, United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Caucus of Labor Committees
it will not do to make the presumption . . . rebuttable and then make the standard of proof for rebuttal unattainably high. this is particularly true where, as here, the attorney must prove a negative, which is always a difficult burden to meet.
cited
Cited "see"
Howard v. First National Bank of Denver, Inc.
See Daniels v. Thomas, 10 Cir., 225 F.2d 795, 798 , certiorari denied 350 U.S. 932 , 76 S.Ct. 303 , 100 L.Ed.2d 815 .
discussed
Cited "see"
John H. Gately v. Leonard v. B. Sutton, Otto Moore, Edward C. Day, William E. Doyle, Frank H. Hall, and Francis J. Knauss
See Daniels v. Thomas, 10 Cir., 225 F.2d 795 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 932 , 76 S.Ct. 303 , 100 L.Ed. 815 ; Jones v. Medlock, 10 Cir., 180 F.2d 658 , cert. denied 340 U.S. 819 , 71 S.Ct. 50 , 95 L.Ed. 602 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re John T. Lansford and Cecily S. Lansford, Debtors. La Trattoria, Inc. v. John T. Lansford and Cecily S. Lansford, John T. Lansford, Cross-Appellant v. La Trattoria, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See, e.g., Zimmerman v. Emmons, 225 F.2d 97, 99 (9th Cir.1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 932 , 76 S.Ct. 302 , 100 L.Ed.2d 814 (1956); 9 C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
La Trattoria, Inc. v. Lansford
See, e.g., Zimmerman v. Emmons, 225 F.2d 97, 99 (9th Cir.1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 932 , 76 S.Ct. 302 , 100 L.Ed.2d 814 (1956); 9 C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Laskey Bros. of West Virginia, Inc.
v.
Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. and Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. Austin Theatre, Inc.
v.
Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. and Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. Austin Theatre, Inc.
No. 456; No. 512.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1956.
Bruno Schachner and Arnold Malkan for petitioners in No. 456. Bruce Bromley for Paramount Film Distributing Corporation et al., George A. Raftery for RKO Keith-Orpheum Theatres, Inc. et al., and Myles J. Lane for Stanley Warner Management Corporation et al., petitioners in No. 512 and respondents in No. 456.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 224 F. 2d 824.