green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McLennan v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
McLennan v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southland Royalty Co. v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allstate Insurance v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Henson v. Hoth
See Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. United States, 352 U.S. 220 , 77 S.Ct. 287 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 267 (1957), rehearing denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 553 , 1 L.Ed.2d 560 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co.
See 224 F.2d 381 , where the Court upheld the issuance of the injunction because “the district court under the clear provisions of the statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1345 , became vested with exclusive jurisdiction to determine the title of the United States to the mineral rights claimed by appellant.” ( 224 F.2d 383 -384.) . 352 U.S. 220 , 77 S.Ct. 287, 292 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 267 , rehearing denied 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 553 , 1 L.Ed.2d 560 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross v. Johnson
P. 53 (2003 Adv. 21 Comm. Notes); see also La Buy v. Howes Leather Co., 352 U.S. 249, 259 , reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 22 (1957) (noting that special masters are to be used sparingly and only when the use of the court’s 23 time is not justified). 24 25 26 3 This section is not applicable, as the defendants do not consent to the appointment of a special master.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Caritativo
v.
California
v.
California
No. 561.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 1957.
352 U.S. 1019
George T. Davis for petitioner. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
Published
Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.