neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Oklahoma Corp. Commission v. United States
See Examiner’s report, 16; and see, e. g., Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States, 306 F.Supp. 338, 340 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 400 U.S. 73 , 91 S.Ct. 259 , 27 L.Ed.2d 212 ; but see Florida Citrus Commission v. United States, 144 F.Supp. 517, 524 (N.D.Fla.), aff’d 352 U.S. 1021 , 77 S.Ct. 589 , 1 L.Ed.2d 595 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Florida Citrus Commission
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 663.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 1957.
M. W. Wells, Lewis W. Petteway, R. Y. Patterson, Jr., Karl D. Loos and Frank C. Brooks for appellants. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Daniel M. Friedman, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns for 'the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Roland J. Lehman, Robert H. Bierma, John H. Colgren, Alfred S: Knowlton, D. Fred McMullen, Russell L. Frink and Harold B. Wahl for the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. et al., Warren H. Wagner for George A. Hormel & Co. et al., and Nuel D. Belnap for Armour & Co. et al., appellees.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.