Hughes v. Great Am. Indem. Co., 352 U.S. 989 (1957). · Go Syfert
Search
Hughes v. Great Am. Indem. Co., 352 U.S. 989 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
86 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 30 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation District (ca9, 1994-07-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation District
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation Dist., 236 F.2d 321, 340 (9th Cir.1956) (holding that agreement between Secretary of the Interior on behalf of the Indians and white settlers, “as other agreements relating to Indian rights, is to be construed most strongly in favor of the Indians”), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation District State of Arizona v. Gila River Indian Community San Carlos Apache Tribe San Carlos Irrigation District, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation Dist., 236 F.2d 321, 340 (9th Cir.1956) (holding that agreement between Secretary of the Interior on behalf of the Indians and white settlers, "as other agreements relating to Indian rights, is to be construed most strongly in favor of the Indians"), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957).
cited Cited "see" Hooker v. Edes Home
D.C. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mount Vernon Mortgage Corp. v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 429 , 430, 236 F.2d 724, 725 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957). 10 .
discussed Cited "see" Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, 236 F.2d 321 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957); American Indian Policy at 147, 158-66. (4) Federal or State Concern.
discussed Cited "see" The Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, A/K/A the Oneida Indian Nation of New York, A/K/A the Oneida Indians of New York the Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, A/K/A the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Inc. And the Oneida of the Thames Band Council, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. The County of Oneida, New York and the County of Madison, New York, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. State of New York, Third Party
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, 236 F.2d 321 (9th Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957); American Indian Policy at 147, 158-66. 55 (4) Federal or State Concern. 56 As stated above the Indians have a federal common law possessory cause of action.
discussed Cited "see" Oneida Indian Nation of New York State v. Oneida
N.D.N.Y. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
“It has long been held that adverse possession under a state statute of limitations cannot run against Indians if the land is not alienable by them, so long as such restrictions exist.” United States v. Schwarz, 460 F.2d 1365, 1371 (7th Cir. 1972); see United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, 236 F.2d 321 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Cariola
D.N.J. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Daniels, 38 N.J. 242 , 183 A.2d 648 (1962). 13 . 18 F.R.D. 417 (D.D.C.1955) aff’d. 98 U.S.App.D.C. 359 , 235 F.2d 856 (1956) cert. denied 352 U.S. 989 , 77 S.Ct. 389 , 1 L.Ed.2d 368 (1957).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States of America, and Spokane Tribe of Indians, Plaintiff-In-Intervention-Appellant v. Barbara J. Anderson, James M. Anderson
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, 236 F.2d 321, 342 (9th Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S.Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stern v. Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & Missionaries
D.D.C. · 1974 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Mount Vernon Mortgage Corp., 128 F.Supp. 629 (D.D.C. 1954), aff’d, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 429 , 236 F.2d 724 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 988 , 77 S. Ct. 386 , 1 L.Ed.2d 367 (1957) ; Gilbert v. McLeod Infirmary, 219 S.C. 174 , 64 S.E.2d 524 (1951); Fowle Mem.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Estate of Albert D. Phillips, Deceased, Viola T. Chartrand, Formerly Viola T. Phillips, Administratrix v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
5th Cir. · 1957 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Meyers v. United States, 134 F.Supp. 520 , at page 523, 133 Ct.Cl. 123 , certiorari denied 352 U.S. 989 , 77 S.Ct. 388 , 1 L.Ed.2d 368 , “The most important part of a net worth computation is the beginning net worth and the most important part of that is the cash on hand.” 2 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hughes
v.
Great American Indemnity Co.
No. 617.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 28, 1957.
352 U.S. 989
Benjamin C. King for petitioners.
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.