green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.2 score
“the mere fact that the item supplied under contract is as good as the one contracted for does not relieve defendants of liability if it can be shown that they attempted to deceive the government agency”
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In the Matter of American Trailer Rentals Company. Securities and Exchange Commission v. American Trailer Rentals Company, Debtor-Appellee
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see, Securities and Exchange Comm. v. Liberty Baking Corp., 2 Cir., 240 F.2d 511 , cert. denied 353 U.S. 930 , 77 S.Ct. 719 , 1 L.Ed.2d 723 , which indicates that the “fair and equitable” rule may be applied in determining whether *52 Chapter X or Chapter XI should be used.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States ex rel. Harman v. Trinity Industries, Inc.
the mere fact that the item supplied under contract is as good as the one contracted for does not relieve defendants of liability if it can be shown that they attempted to deceive the government agency
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Marshall v. Marshall
As the court said in Butler v. Holman (1956) 146 Cal.App.2d 22, 28 [ 303 P.2d 573 ], cert, denied 353 U.S. 930 *252 [ 77 S.Ct. 718 , 1 L.Ed.2d 723 ], “Laches is an unreasonable delay in asserting a right which causes such prejudice to an adverse party as renders the granting of relief inequitable. ’ ’ [11] The question of laches is one for the determination of the trial court in the light of the facts and circumstances of the particular case and its conclusion thereon will not be set aside by an appellate court if there is substantial support for it in the evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Virginia Priola
See United States v. National Wholesalers, 9 Cir., 1956, 236 F.2d 944 , certiorari denied 353 U.S. 930 , 77 S.Ct. 719 , 1 L.Ed.2d 724 ; Daniel v. United States, 5 Cir., 1956, 234 F.2d 102 ; United States ex rel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holman
v.
Butler
v.
Butler
No. 787.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 8, 1957.
Albert W. Dilling and Kirkpatrick W. Dilling for petitioners. Richard Z. Lam-berson for respondents.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. Texas (1)
District Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District. Certiorari denied.