Nationwide Trailer Rental Sys., Inc. v. United States, 355 U.S. 10 (1957). · Go Syfert
Search
Nationwide Trailer Rental Sys., Inc. v. United States, 355 U.S. 10 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: (PC) Murillo v. District Attorney Office (caed, 2023-07-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" (PC) Murillo v. District Attorney Office
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Marino v. Classic Auto Refinishing, Inc., 37 F.3d 1354 , 8 | 1357 (9th Cir. 1994) (“The purpose of notice pleading is to give the defendant fair notice of what 9 | the plaintiff's claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.”) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 10 41,47 (1957)). 11 Plaintiff may file an amended complaint.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONWIDE TRAILER RENTAL SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES.
114.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1957.
355 U.S. 10
Per Curiam.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.

Thurman Arnold, Reed Miller and William T. Stephens for appellants.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Charles H. Weston for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.