green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Valore L. Marcinak v. The West Indies Investment Company
See Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Secatore’s, Inc., 1 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 17, 22-23 , cert. den. 355 U.S. 834 , 78 S. Ct. 54 , 2 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bolick-Gillman Company v. Continental Baking Company
See Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Secatore’s, Inc., 246 F.2d 17 (1st Cir., 1957), cert. den. 355 U.S. 834 , 78 S.Ct. 54 , 2 L.Ed.2d 46 (1957); but see Rice v. Asheville Ice Co., 204 N.C. 768 , 169 S.E. 707 (1933) (holding that plaintiff retail ice dealer is not a competitor of defendant ice manufacturers who sold both wholesale and retail).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aaron v. Cooper
See Kasper v. Brittain, 6 Cir., 1957, 245 F.2d 92 , certiorari denied 355 U.S. 834 , 78 S.Ct. 54 , 2 L.Ed.2d 46 , rehearing denied 355 U.S. 886 , 78 S.Ct. 147 , 2 L.Ed.2d 115 ; Hoxie School Dis trict No. 46 of Lawrence County, Ark. v. Brewer, D.C.E.D.Ark., 137 F.Supp. 364 , affirmed Brewer v. Hoxie School District, 8 Cir., 1956, 238 F.2d 91 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Aaron v. Cooper
See Kasper v. Brittain, 6 Cir., 1957, 245 F.2d 92 , certiorari denied 355 U.S. 834 , 78 S.Ct. 54 , 2 L.Ed.2d 46 , rehearing denied 355 U.S. 886 , 78 S.Ct. 147 , 2 L.Ed.2d 115 ; Hoxie School District No. 46 of Lawrence County, Ark. v. Brewer, D.C.E.D.Ark., 137 F.Supp. 364 , affirmed Brewer v. Hoxie School District, 8 Cir., 1956, 238 F.2d 91 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
See also Esso Standard Oil Company v. Secatore’s, Inc., 246 F.2d 17 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 834 , 78 S.Ct. 54 , 2 L.Ed.2d 46 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowen v. New York News, Inc.
See also, Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Secatore’s Inc., 246 F.2d 17, 21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 834 , 78 S.Ct. 54 , 2 L.Ed.2d 46 (1957). 32 In Janel Sales Corp. v. Lanvin Parfums, Inc., 396 F.2d 398 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 938 , 89 S.Ct. 303 , 21 L.Ed.2d 275 (1968), the Second Circuit considered this • specific question and concluded that “the legislative history [indicates] that it is immaterial whether a manufacturer-retailer and a signing retailer are in actual competition.” 396 F.2d at 403 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Furman v. Georgia
(2×)
See also Kasper v. Brittain, 245 F. 2d 92, 96 (CA6), cert. denied, 355 U. S. 834 (1957) ("shocking to the sense of justice"); People v. Morris, 80 Mich. 634, 639 , 45 N. W. 591, 592 (1890) ("shock the moral sense of the people").
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
G.E.M. Sundries Company, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Compare Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Seca-tore’s, Inc., 1 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 17 , certiorari denied 355 U.S. 834 , 78 S.Ct. 54 , 2 L.Ed.2d 46 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kelley, Glover & Vale, Inc., Trustee
v.
Coffing, Trustee
v.
Coffing, Trustee
No. 308.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1957.
Jay E. Darlington for petitioner. Albert H. Gavit for Coffing, respondent.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.