green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wellness Community-National v. Wellness House
See Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. New Cut Rate Liquors, Inc., 245 F.2d 453 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 837 , 78 S.Ct. 61 , 2 L.Ed.2d 48 (1957); Snap-On Tools Corp. v. Winkenweder & Ladd, Inc., 250 F.2d 154 (7th Cir.1957). 6 .Although the Tamarind court stated that the remedy is premised on well established requisites, its statement appears overly self-assured in light of other common law that questions the mutuality requisite.
cited
Cited "see"
Dickson v. Burlington Northern Railroad
See Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Bowman, 11 Ill.2d 186 , 142 N.E.2d 104, 114 , cert. denied, 355 U.S. 837 , 78 S.Ct. 63 , 2 L.Ed.2d 49 (1957).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc., and Hayden Stone, Inc. v. William H. Leach
See, e. g., Commodity Credit Corp. v. Rosenberg Bros. & Co., 243 F.2d 504, 511-12 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 837 , 78 S.Ct. 62 , 2 L.Ed.2d 48 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert L. MARTIN and L. A. Martin
v.
S. BIRCH & SONS, a Corporation, C. F. Lytle, a Corporation, and Green Construction Company, a Corporation, Partners Doing Business as Birch, Lytle & Green
v.
S. BIRCH & SONS, a Corporation, C. F. Lytle, a Corporation, and Green Construction Company, a Corporation, Partners Doing Business as Birch, Lytle & Green
No. 359.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1957.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Denied.