green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Sherrod v. State
See Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 , 77 S.Ct. 1304 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 (1957), rehearing denied, Roth v. United States, 355 U.S. 853 , 78 S.Ct. 8 , 2 L.Ed.2d 60 (1957), rehearing denied, Alberts v. California, 355 U.S. 852 , 78 S.Ct. 8 , 2 L.Ed.2d 60 (1957), clarified by, Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2794 , 86 L.Ed.2d 394 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diehl v. State
(2×)
See Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 , 77 S.Ct. 1304 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 , reh. den., 355 U.S. 852 , 78 S.Ct. 8 , 2 L.Ed.2d 60 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Orbovich v. Macalester College
See also, Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 , 77 S.Ct. 1203 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1957), reh. denied, 355 U.S. 852 , 78 S.Ct. 7 , 2 L.Ed.2d 61 (1957), where, in the much-cited concurring opinion, Justice Frankfurter, at 263, noted four essential “freedoms” of a university, including the freedom to determine “who may teach, what may be taught, how it shall be taught and who may be admitted to study.” So, based upon these authorities, this policy interest, and the threatened harm to the frank resolution of its own tenure decisions, defendant resists disclosure of both plaintiff’s tenur…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sweezy
v.
New Hampshire, by Wyman, Attorney General Stoneking v. United States
v.
New Hampshire, by Wyman, Attorney General Stoneking v. United States
No. 175; No. 802.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1957.
Applications, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
354 U. S. 234; and
354 U. S. 941. Petitions for rehearing denied.